ArticleHNO2020
Upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-Can radiological position monitoring predict tongue motion one year after implantation?
Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-operative radiological evaluation of a bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation system.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The Need for Postoperative Chest X-Ray After Placement of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Up versus down: Does cuff spine orientation affect early adherence to upper airway stimulation?Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTongue motion patterns (TMP) can influence the outcome of upper airway stimulation (UAS) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). As a postoperative control, the cuff position of the stimulation lead is monitored via X‑ray imaging. A multidimensional X‑ray assessment system was established and the association between these positional assessments and TMP was investigated 1 year after implantation. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study on TMP and the X‑ray assessments were carried out at a German ear nose and throat clinic as an implantation center. The TMPs were assessed under bipolar electrode configuration and were categorized according to the currently available literature as right-sided protrusion (RP), left-sided protrusion (LP), bilateral protrusion (BP) and mixed activation (MA). The X‑ray assessment was carried out in five dimensions: the position relative to the mandible and hyoid, cuff steepness in the lateral view of the neck, the cuff position based on the single electrode, and the lead connection to the cuff in the anterior-posterior view. The analyses were performed by three raters with different medical backgrounds and knowledge regarding TMP.
resultsIn approximately 60% of patients, the apnea-hypopnea index was reduced to below 15/h 1 year after implantation. The most common TMPs were RP and BP (82.9%). The interrater variability of the X‑ray assessment was good except for one category. Furthermore, no relevant associations were found apart from the correlation between a favorable TMP and the cuff position with respect to the lateral position of the stimulation cable.
conclusionDespite good interrater variability and convenient usage of the suggested X‑ray assessment system, this approach did not enable the identification of any associations by which a TM and, therefore, a possible straightforward or complicated treatment pathway could be predicted. Attention should possibly be paid to a rotation of the cuff during implantation with a lateral position of the stimulation lead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31598770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.