Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598637›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Expectation pooling: an effective and interpretable pooling method for predicting DNA-protein binding.

Xiao Luo, Xinming Tu, Yang Ding, Ge Gao, Minghua Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Integrated TCN-CrossMHA Model for Predicting circRNA-RBP Binding Sites.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-Wide Identification of C2H2 ZFPs and Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Modern deep learning in bioinformatics.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao LuoSchool of Mathematical Sciences.
Xinming TuBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Center for Bioinformatics (CBI), and the State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research at School of Life Sciences.
Yang DingBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Center for Bioinformatics (CBI), and the State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research at School of Life Sciences.
Ge GaoBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Center for Bioinformatics (CBI), and the State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research at School of Life Sciences.
Minghua DengSchool of Mathematical Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificity of DNA-protein binding. While previous studies have built a connection between CNNs and probabilistic models, simple models of CNNs cannot achieve sufficient accuracy on this problem. Recently, some methods of neural networks have increased performance using complex neural networks whose results cannot be directly interpreted. However, it is difficult to combine probabilistic models and CNNs effectively to improve DNA-protein binding predictions.

resultsIn this article, we present a novel global pooling method: expectation pooling for predicting DNA-protein binding. Our pooling method stems naturally from the expectation maximization algorithm, and its benefits can be interpreted both statistically and via deep learning theory. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our pooling method improves the prediction performance DNA-protein binding. Our interpretable pooling method combines probabilistic ideas with global pooling by taking the expectations of inputs without increasing the number of parameters. We also analyze the hyperparameters in our method and propose optional structures to help fit different datasets. We explore how to effectively utilize these novel pooling methods and show that combining statistical methods with deep learning is highly beneficial, which is promising and meaningful for future studies in this field. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code is public in https://github.com/gao-lab/ePooling. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MotivationProteinsDNANeural Networks, ComputerProtein BindingDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID31598637
PMCPMC7703793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.