ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
ErrorTracer: an algorithm for identifying the origins of inconsistencies in genome-scale metabolic models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MACAW: a method for semi-automatic detection of errors in genome-scale metabolic models.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Addressing uncertainty in genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction and analysis.Genome biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe number and complexity of genome-scale metabolic models is steadily increasing, empowered by automated model-generation algorithms. The quality control of the models, however, has always remained a significant challenge, the most fundamental being reactions incapable of carrying flux. Numerous automated gap-filling algorithms try to address this problem, but can rarely resolve all of a model's inconsistencies. The need for fast inconsistency checking algorithms has also been emphasized with the recent community push for automated model-validation before model publication. Previously, we wrote a graphical software to allow the modeller to solve the remaining errors manually. Nevertheless, model size and complexity remained a hindrance to efficiently tracking origins of inconsistency.
resultsWe developed the ErrorTracer algorithm in order to address the shortcomings of existing approaches: ErrorTracer searches for inconsistencies, classifies them and identifies their origins. The algorithm is ∼2 orders of magnitude faster than current community standard methods, using only seconds even for large-scale models. This allows for interactive exploration in direct combination with model visualization, markedly simplifying the whole error-identification and correction work flow. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Windows and Linux executables and source code are available under the EPL 2.0 Licence at https://github.com/TheAngryFox/ModelExplorer and https://www.ntnu.edu/almaaslab/downloads. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.