Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598631›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

ErrorTracer: an algorithm for identifying the origins of inconsistencies in genome-scale metabolic models.

Nikolay Martyushenko, Eivind Almaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikolay MartyushenkoDepartment of Biotechnology.
Eivind AlmaasDepartment of Biotechnology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe number and complexity of genome-scale metabolic models is steadily increasing, empowered by automated model-generation algorithms. The quality control of the models, however, has always remained a significant challenge, the most fundamental being reactions incapable of carrying flux. Numerous automated gap-filling algorithms try to address this problem, but can rarely resolve all of a model's inconsistencies. The need for fast inconsistency checking algorithms has also been emphasized with the recent community push for automated model-validation before model publication. Previously, we wrote a graphical software to allow the modeller to solve the remaining errors manually. Nevertheless, model size and complexity remained a hindrance to efficiently tracking origins of inconsistency.

resultsWe developed the ErrorTracer algorithm in order to address the shortcomings of existing approaches: ErrorTracer searches for inconsistencies, classifies them and identifies their origins. The algorithm is ∼2 orders of magnitude faster than current community standard methods, using only seconds even for large-scale models. This allows for interactive exploration in direct combination with model visualization, markedly simplifying the whole error-identification and correction work flow. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Windows and Linux executables and source code are available under the EPL 2.0 Licence at https://github.com/TheAngryFox/ModelExplorer and https://www.ntnu.edu/almaaslab/downloads. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysGenomeSoftwareWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID31598631
PMCPMC7703767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.