Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598519›Full record

ReviewMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2019

Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Review Article.

Uma Vaidyanathan, Grant C Hopping, Harry Y Liu, Anisha N Somani, Yasmyne C Ronquillo, Phillip C Hoopes, Majid Moshirfar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. The efficacy of autologous serum in corneal healing following metallic foreign body injuries.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uma VaidyanathanMcGovern Medical School, Health Science Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Grant C HoppingMcGovern Medical School, Health Science Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Harry Y LiuMcGovern Medical School, Health Science Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Anisha N SomaniMcGovern Medical School, Health Science Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Yasmyne C RonquilloHoopes Durrie Rivera Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Phillip C HoopesHoopes Durrie Rivera Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Majid MoshirfarHoopes Durrie Rivera Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Hoopes Vision · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent corneal epithelial defects (PEDs or PCEDs) result from the failure of rapid re-epithelialization and closure within 10-14 days after a corneal injury, even with standard supportive treatment. Disruptions in the protective epithelial and stromal layers of the cornea can render the eye susceptible to infection, stromal ulceration, perforation, scarring, and significant vision loss. Although several therapies exist and an increasing number of novel approaches are emerging, treatment of PEDs can still be quite challenging. It is important to treat the underlying causative condition, which may include an infection, limbal stem cell deficiency, or diabetes, in order to facilitate wound healing. Standard treatments, such as bandage contact lenses (BCLs) and artificial tears (ATs), aim to provide barrier protection to the epithelial layer. Recently-developed medical treatments can target the re-epithelialization process by facilitating access to growth factors and anti-inflammatory agents, and novel surgical techniques can provide re-innervation to the cornea. PEDs should be treated within 7-10 days to avoid secondary complications. These interventions, along with a step-wise approach to management, can be useful in patients with PEDs that are refractory to standard medical treatment. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, current and novel management, and prognosis of persistent epithelial defects.

Indexed as

AlbuminsEpidermal Growth FactorFibronectinGrowth FactorInsulin-Like Growth Factor IOphthalmic SolutionsThymosin Beta-4

Identifiers

PMID31598519
PMCPMC6778469
OpenAlexW2998597179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.