Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598465›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in rheumatology2019

The Role of Vascular Imaging to Advance Clinical Care and Research in Large-Vessel Vasculitis.

Kaitlin A Quinn, Peter C Grayson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlin A QuinnSystemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter C GraysonSystemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Georgetown University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe two main forms of large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) are giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). Vascular imaging can characterize disease activity and disease extent in LVV. This review critically analyzes the clinical utility of vascular imaging in LVV and highlights how imaging may be incorporated into the management and study of these conditions. RECENT

findingsThere are multiple imaging modalities available to assess LVV including ultrasonography, CT angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and SUMMARY: There are strengths and weaknesses associated with vascular imaging that should be considered when evaluating patients with LVV. Vascular imaging will likely play an increasingly important role in the clinical management of patients and the conduct of research in LVV and may ultimately be incorporated as outcome measures in clinical trials in these conditions.

Indexed as

angiographygiant cell arteritislarge-vessel vasculitispositron emission tomographyTakayasu’s arteritisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31598465
PMCPMC6784843
OpenAlexW2914852239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.