ArticlePeerJ2019
Identification of potential biomarkers and pivotal biological pathways for prostate cancer using bioinformatics analysis methods.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- RNA-Seq Uncovers Association of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Hub Genes and Transcription Factors in Aggressive Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Discovery of Essential Genes as Possible Targets for Prostate Cancer Drug Development.International journal of genomics · 2025Article
- The role of NOP58 in prostate cancer progression through SUMOylation regulation and drug response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Influence Hub Genes Associated with Aggressive Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Antitumor Effects of Poplar Propolis on DLBCL SU-DHL-2 Cells.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Environmental Phenol and Paraben Exposure Risks and Their Potential Influence on the Gene Expression Involved in the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Screening a novel six critical gene-based system of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in prostate adenocarcinoma patients with different clinical variables.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- High copy number variations, particular transcription factors, and low immunity contribute to the stemness of prostate cancer cells.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Bioinformatic analysis of dysregulated proteins in prostate cancer patients reveals putative urinary biomarkers and key biological pathways.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021Article
- Determination of the glycoprotein specificity of lectins on cell membranes through oxidative proteomics.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Integrative Analysis of DNA Methylation Identified 12 Signature Genes Specific to Metastatic ccRCC.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Identification of drug targets and potential molecular mechanisms for Wantong Jingu Tablet extract in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: bioinformatics analysis of fibroblast-like synoviocytes.Chinese medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is a common urinary malignancy, whose molecular mechanism has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to screen for key genes and biological pathways related to PCa using bioinformatics method.
methodsDifferentially expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered out from the GSE103512 dataset and subjected to the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. The protein-protein interactions (PPI) network was constructed, following by the identification of hub genes. The results of former studies were compared with ours. The relative expression levels of hub genes were examined in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Oncomine public databases. The University of California Santa Cruz Xena online tools were used to study whether the expression of hub genes was correlated with the survival of PCa patients from TCGA cohorts.
resultsTotally, 252 (186 upregulated and 66 downregulated) DEGs were identified. GO analysis enriched mainly in "oxidation-reduction process" and "positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter"; KEGG pathway analysis enriched mostly in "metabolic pathways" and "protein digestion and absorption." Kallikrein-related peptidase 3, cadherin 1 (CDH1), Kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (KLK2), forkhead box A1 (FOXA1), and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) were identified as hub genes from the PPI network. CDH1, FOXA1, and EPCAM were validated by other relevant gene expression omnibus datasets. All hub genes were validated by both TCGA and Oncomine except KLK2. Two additional top DEGs (ABCC4 and SLPI) were found to be associated with the prognosis of PCa patients.
conclusionsThis study excavated the key genes and pathways in PCa, which might be biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.