ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2019
Biomarkers for Evaluating the Inflammation Status in Patients with Cancer.
Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prognostic Value of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index on Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The modified-Gustave Roussy immune score: assessing immune prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients at baseline.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis reveals ENC1 as a promising prognostic biomarker for tumor microenvironment and therapeutic responses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reference intervals of biochemical parameters in Chilean adults.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the hemoglobin cutoff point for anemia in adult women residents of different altitudinal levels in Peru.PloS one · 2024Article
- Relationship of preoperative oral hypofunction with prognostic nutritional index in gastric cancer: A case-control retrospective study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Biological Rationale for Peripheral Blood Cell-Derived Inflammatory Indices and Related Prognostic Scores in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Safe Discharge Criteria After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2022Article
- Hypoalbuminemia predicts inferior outcome in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.Infectious agents and cancer · 2022Article
- C-Reactive Protein and Serum Albumin Ratio: A Feasible Prognostic Marker in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Perioperative Inflammatory Response and Cancer Recurrence in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- An atlas of dynamic peripheral blood mononuclear cell landscapes in human perioperative anaesthesia/surgery.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Article
- Oncology during the New Coronavirus Infection Pandemic.Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
- Recurrence Kinetics after Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Colon Cancer. A Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Fibrosis-5 predicts end-stage renal disease in patients with microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis without substantial liver diseases.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Association between the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tertiary lymphoid structures surrounding tumor in gastric cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index in cases of resected oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Prognostic Value of Postoperative Neutrophil and Albumin: Reassessment One Month After Gastric Cancer Surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Current status and future potential of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer.ESMO open · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation can be a causative factor for carcinogenesis or can result from a consequence of cancer progression. Moreover, cancer therapeutic interventions can also induce an inflammatory response. Various inflammatory parameters are used to assess the inflammatory status during cancer treatment. It is important to select the most optimal biomarker among these parameters. Additionally, suitable biomarkers must be examined if there are no known parameters. We briefly reviewed the published literature for the use of inflammatory parameters in the treatment of patients with cancer. Most studies on inflammation evaluated the correlation between host characteristics, effect of interventions, and clinical outcomes. Additionally, the levels of C-reactive protein, albumin, lymphocytes, and platelets were the most commonly used laboratory parameters, either independently or in combination with other laboratory parameters and clinical characteristics. Furthermore, the immune parameters are classically examined using flow cytometry, immunohistochemical staining, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques. However, gene expression profiling can aid in assessing the overall peri-interventional immune status. The checklists of guidelines, such as STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy and REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies should be considered when designing studies to investigate the inflammatory parameters. Finally, the data should be interpreted after adjusting for clinically important variables, such as age and cancer stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.