Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598332›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2019

Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: should everyone get one?

William G Blakeney, Jean-Alain Epinette, Pascal-André Vendittoli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Medium-term outcome of the LibraBMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023
    Article
  20. Advances in Hip Replacement Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William G BlakeneyDepartment of Surgery, CIUSSS-de-L'Est-de-L'Ile-de-Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jean-Alain EpinetteClinique Médico-chirurgicale, Bruay la Buissière, France.
Pascal-André VendittoliDepartment of Surgery, Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia.
Chimie Moléculaire, Macromoléculaire, Matériaux · FRHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a major challenge and is one of the main causes of revision surgery.Dual mobility (DM) implants have been introduced to try to overcome this problem. The DM design consists of a small femoral head captive and mobile within a polyethylene liner.Numerous studies have shown that DM implants reduce the rate of dislocation compared to fixed-bearing inserts.Early designs for DM implants had problems with wear and intra-prosthetic dislocations, so their use was restricted to limited indications.The results of the latest generation of DM prostheses demonstrate that these problems have been overcome. Given the results of these studies presented in this review, surgeons may now consider DM THA for a wider patient selection. Cite this article:

Indexed as

dislocationdual mobilitytotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31598332
PMCPMC6771074
OpenAlexW2971687071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.