ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
Proteomic method to extract, concentrate, digest and enrich peptides from fossils with coloured (humic) substances for mass spectrometry analyses.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bone need not remain an elephant in the room for radiocarbon dating.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Molecular tests support the viability of rare earth elements as proxies for fossil biomolecule preservation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Proteomic method to extract, concentrate, digest and enrich peptides from fossils with coloured (humic) substances for mass spectrometry analyses.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humic substances are breakdown products of decaying organic matter that co-extract with proteins from fossils. These substances are difficult to separate from proteins in solution and interfere with analyses of fossil proteomes. We introduce a method combining multiple recent advances in extraction protocols to both concentrate proteins from fossil specimens with high humic content and remove humics, producing clean samples easily analysed by mass spectrometry (MS). This method includes: (i) a non-demineralizing extraction buffer that eliminates protein loss during the demineralization step in routine methods; (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) of peptides, which concentrates and digests extracts in one filter, allowing the separation of large humics after digestion; (iii) centrifugal stage tipping, which further clarifies and concentrates samples in a uniform process performed simultaneously on multiple samples. We apply this method to a moa fossil (approx. 800-1000 years) dark with humic content, generating colourless samples and enabling the detection of more proteins with greater sequence coverage than previous MS analyses on this same specimen. This workflow allows analyses of low-abundance proteins in fossils containing humics and thus may widen the range of extinct organisms and regions of their proteomes we can explore with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.