ArticleJournal of Cancer2019
The use of DNA repair genes as prognostic indicators of gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of DNA repair gene and TP53 co-mutation in predicting the response of non-small cell lung cancer to immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- In Silico Insights Reveal Fibronectin 1 as a Theranostic Marker in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identification of a prognostic DNA repair gene signature in esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a DNA damage repair-related gene-based prediction model for the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Identification of DNA repair gene signature and potential molecular subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis of Serine Racemase as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Dynamic Changes in Myofibroblasts Affect the Carcinogenesis and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer Associated With Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Novel DNA Damage Repair-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Glioma Prognosis.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Unsupervised Hierarchical Clustering Identifies Immune Gene Subtypes in Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Development and validation of a DNA repair gene signature for prognosis prediction in Colon Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- DNA Repair-Based Gene Expression Signature and Distinct Molecular Subtypes for Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA repair genes can be used as prognostic biomarkers in many types of cancer. We aimed to identify prognostic DNA repair genes in patients with gastric cancer (GC) by systematically bioinformatic approaches using web-based database. Global gene expression profiles from altogether 1,325 GC patients' samples from six independent datasets were included in the study. Clustering analysis was performed to screen potentially abnormal DNA repair genes related to the prognosis of GC, followed by unsupervised clustering analysis to identify molecular subtypes of GC. Characteristics and prognosis differences were analyzed among these molecular subtypes, and modular key genes in molecular subtypes were identified based on changes in expression correlation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to find the independent prognostic gene. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to estimate correlations of key DNA repair genes with GC patients'overall survival. There were 57 key genes significantly associated to GC patients' prognosis, and patients were stratified into three molecular clusters based on their expression profiles, in which patients in Cluster 3 showed the best survival (P < 0.05). After a three-phase training, test and validation process, the expression profile of 13 independent key DNA repair genes were identified can classify the prognostic risk of patients. Compared with patients with low-risk score, patients with high risk score in the training set had shorter overall survival (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, we verified equivalent findings by these key DNA repair genes in the test set (P < 0.0001) and the independent validation set (P = 0.0024). Our results suggest a great potential for the use of DNA repair gene profiling as a powerful marker in prognostication and inform treatment decisions for GC patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.