ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2019
Folfirinox
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacoethnicity of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The role of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Equivalent Efficacy but Different Safety Profiles of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.Biomolecules · 2021Trial
- DDR1 sustains ferroptosis resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via SLC40A1-mediated iron homeostasis.Oncogene · 2026Article
- Optimization of first-line treatment selection in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- FedECA: federated external control arms for causal inference with time-to-event data in distributed settings.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Sequences for mFOLFIRINOX (or SOXIRI) and Gemcitabine Plus Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- The Trends and Outcomes of Initial Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in Korea Based on National Health Insurance Service Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma third line systemic treatments: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Folfirinox vs. Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of oncology · 2023Review
- Real-Life Results of Palliative Chemotherapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel validated prognostic score to facilitate treatment decision-making in real-world.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Modified FOLFIRINOX compared to Gemcitabine & nab-Paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - results of a match-pair analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Arterial resection during operative management of pancreatic head and uncinate process adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFolfirinox (FFX) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) are both standard first-line treatments in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, data comparing these two chemotherapeutic regimens and their sequential use remain scarce.
methodsData from two independent cohorts enrolling patients treated with FFX (
resultsIn the whole study population, OS was significantly higher in FFX (14 months; 95% CI: 10-21) than in GN groups (9 months; 95% CI: 8-12) before (
conclusionThis study shows greater OS with FFX than with GN in patients with mPC. GN after FFX failure appears more feasible than the reverse sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.