ArticleBreeding science2019
Parsley
Article in Breeding science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas12a-mediated gene editing of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) employing a transient protoplast system.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Heterologous expression of heat-resistant obscure (Hero) proteins enhances thermotolerance in plants.iScience · 2025Article
- Efficient targeted mutagenesis in tetraploidHorticulture research · 2024Article
- Importance of pre-mRNA splicing and its study tools in plants.Advanced biotechnology · 2024Review
- Isolation and Functional Characterization of a Constitutive Promoter in Upland Cotton (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Development of virus-induced genome editing methods in Solanaceous crops.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Article
- Overcoming Difficulties in Molecular Biological Analysis through a Combination of Genetic Engineering, Genome Editing, and Genome Analysis in HexaploidPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Excision of DNA fragments with thePlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Isolation and Functional Characterization of a Green-Tissue Promoter in Japonica Rice (Biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Optimizing sgRNA to Improve CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Efficiency: Special Focus on Human and Animal Cell.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Turning Up the Temperature on CRISPR: Increased Temperature Can Improve the Editing Efficiency of Wheat Using CRISPR/Cas9.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chrysanthemum (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.