Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598047›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019

Effect of Melatonin on Blood Loss After Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

Marzieh Beigom Khezri, Morteza Delkhosh Reihany, Talaat Dabbaghi Ghaleh, Navid Mohammadi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Innovations in the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: Analysis of a novel medicines development pipeline database.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  5. Melatonin for the Management of Preeclampsia: A Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marzieh Beigom Khezri1Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Science, Qazvin, Iran.
Morteza Delkhosh Reihany1Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Science, Qazvin, Iran.
Talaat Dabbaghi Ghaleh2Dpartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Navid Mohammadi3Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, PO Box 3419759811, Qazvin, Iran.
Qazvin University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe similarities between the melatonin and oxytocin signaling could lead to increased contractility of myometrium. We designed this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin in reduction of blood loss during and after the lower segment cesarean section.

methodsOne hundred and twenty patients who had been scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in the study. We randomly allocated them to one of the three following groups to receive either melatonin 3 mg (M

resultsThere was a significant difference between the group M

conclusionUsing 6 mg melatonin, sublingually, as a premedication in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia could statistically reduce the amount of blood loss after the lower segment cesarean section, although it may not be clinically meaningful.

Indexed as

Blood lossCesareanMelatoninSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID31598047
PMCPMC6765044
OpenAlexW2941188052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.