Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598045›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019

Cesarean Myomectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.

T Ramya, Shraddha S Sabnis, T V Chitra, Seetha Panicker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T RamyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PSGIMSR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004 India.
Shraddha S SabnisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PSGIMSR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-9454
T V ChitraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PSGIMSR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004 India.
Seetha PanickerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PSGIMSR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature supports the removal of myomas during cesarean section, which traditionally was considered a relative contraindication, given a higher complication rate. This study is to share our experience of cesarean myomectomy in the last decade.

methodsThis study is a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database, from January 2008 to December 2017, at a tertiary care level teaching institution. All patients who underwent myomectomy during cesarean section were included. There were no exclusions.

resultsA total of twenty patients underwent myoma removal along with the cesarean operation during this period with a mean age of 30 years. Majority of patients were nulliparous (70%). Common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (40%) and hypothyroidism (20%). Mean size of myomas were 5.33 cm (± 2.08), and the number varied from one to three. The most common location was the posterior surface of the uterus with the commonest variety being subserous. Most patients were discharged on the fifth postoperative day.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that cesarean myomectomy to be a safe and feasible procedure in experienced hands. It offers the advantage of avoiding a second surgery in selected patients.

Indexed as

Cesarean deliveryCesarean myomectomyMyoma uterusMyomectomy

Identifiers

PMID31598045
PMCPMC6765039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.