Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Antibacterial properties and regenerative potential of Sr

A D Anastasiou, M Nerantzaki, E Gounari, M S Duggal, P V Giannoudis, A Jha, D Bikiaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Strong Protective Action of CeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel CaFJournal of functional biomaterials · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A D AnastasiouSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. antonios.anastasiou@manchester.ac.uk.
M NerantzakiSorbonne University, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8234, PHENIX Laboratory, case 51, 4 place Jussieu, 75252, Paris cedex 05, France.
E GounariLaboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 541 24, Macedonia, Greece.
M S DuggalFaculty of Dentistry, National University Centre for Oral Health, Singapore, Singapore.
P V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
A JhaSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
D BikiarisLaboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Technology, Chemistry Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffolds and implants in orthopaedics and regenerative dentistry usually fail because of bacterial infections. A promising solution would be the development of biomaterials with both significant regenerative potential and enhanced antibacterial activity. Working towards this direction, fluorapatite was synthesised and doped with Sr

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsApatitesBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCesiumChitosanDental PulpHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOsteoblastsPeri-ImplantitisRegenerative EndodonticsStem CellsStrontiumAnti-Bacterial AgentsApatitesBiocompatible MaterialsCesiumChitosanfluorapatiteStrontium

Identifiers

PMID31597949
PMCPMC6785562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.