Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597749›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Line Immunoassay for Confirmation and Discrimination of Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Infections in Inconclusive Western Blot Serum Samples from Brazil.

Karoline R Campos, Fred L N Santos, Vanessa da Silva Brito, Noilson L S Gonçalves, Thessika H A Araujo, Bernardo Galvão-Castro, Adele Caterino-de-Araujo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karoline R Campos *Immunology Department, Adolfo Lutz Institute (IAL), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fred L N Santos *Advanced Laboratory of Public Health, Gonçalo Moniz Institute (IGM), FIOCRUZ-BA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-0818
Vanessa da Silva BritoIntegrated and Multidisciplinary HTLV Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health (EBMSP), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Noilson L S GonçalvesAdvanced Laboratory of Public Health, Gonçalo Moniz Institute (IGM), FIOCRUZ-BA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Thessika H A AraujoIntegrated and Multidisciplinary HTLV Center, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health (EBMSP), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Bernardo Galvão-Castro *Advanced Laboratory of Public Health, Gonçalo Moniz Institute (IGM), FIOCRUZ-BA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil bgalvao@bahiana.edu.br adele.caterino@ial.sp.gov.br.
Adele Caterino-de-Araujo *Immunology Department, Adolfo Lutz Institute (IAL), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil bgalvao@bahiana.edu.br adele.caterino@ial.sp.gov.br.
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difficulties in confirming and discriminating human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 infections by serological Western blot (WB) assays (HTLV Blot 2.4; MP Biomedicals) have been reported in Brazil, mainly in HIV/AIDS patients, with a large number of WB-indeterminate and WB-positive but HTLV-untypeable results. Nonetheless, a line immunoassay (LIA) (INNO-LIA HTLV-I/II; Fujirebio) provided enhanced specificity and sensitivity for confirming HTLV-1/2 infections. To add information concerning the improved ability of the LIA in relation to WB when applied to samples of individuals from different risk groups from Brazil, we performed the present study. Three groups were analyzed: group 1 (G1), with 62 samples from HIV/AIDS patients from São Paulo, SP (48 WB indeterminate and 14 HTLV untypeable); group 2 (G2), with 24 samples from patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C from São Paulo (21 WB indeterminate and 3 HTLV untypeable; 17 HIV seropositive); and group 3 (G3), with 25 samples from an HTLV outpatient clinic in Salvador, Bahia (16 WB indeterminate and 9 HTLV untypeable; all HIV seronegative). Overall, the LIA confirmed HTLV-1/2 infection (HTLV-1, HTLV-2, or HTLV) in 66.1% (G1), 83.3% (G2), and 76.0% (G3) of samples. Interestingly, the majority of WB-indeterminate results were confirmed by the LIA as being HTLV-2 positive in G1 and G2 but not in G3, in which the samples were defined as being HTLV-1 or HTLV positive. These results agree with the virus types that circulate in such patients of different regions in Brazil and emphasize that the LIA is the best serological test for confirming HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infections, independently of being applied in HTLV-monoinfected or HTLV-coinfected individuals.

Indexed as

Human T-lymphotropic virus 1Human T-lymphotropic virus 2ImmunoassayAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCoinfectionFemaleHTLV-II InfectionsHTLV-I InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Agedconfirmatory serological testsdiagnosticHTLVLIAWB

Identifiers

PMID31597749
PMCPMC6935901
OpenAlexW2979470457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.