Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597690›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2019

Previsit Screening for Parental Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Douglas J Opel, Nora Henrikson, Katherine Lepere, Rene Hawkes, Chuan Zhou, John Dunn, James A Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Seroconversion rate after vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with cancer-a systematic review.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas J OpelSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; douglas.opel@seattlechildrens.org.
Nora HenriksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Katherine LepereSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Rene HawkesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Chuan ZhouSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
John DunnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
James A TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Use of a Novel Parent-Report Measure to Improve Childhood Vaccine UptakeR21HD083770 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2016 to 2017
$454k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD083770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of vaccine hesitancy screening on childhood vaccine uptake.

methodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in pediatric primary care clinics in Washington state. Vaccine-hesitant parents (VHPs) with a healthy newborn receiving health supervision at participating clinics were eligible. VHPs were identified by using a 4-item version of the validated Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines Survey (PACV). Before their child's 2- and 6-month health supervision visits, VHPs at intervention clinics completed the 15-item PACV embedded in a survey containing placebo items. Intervention providers received a summary of parents' 15-item PACV responses and interpretation of their PACV score; discretion was given to providers regarding how they acted on this information. VHPs at control clinics completed only the placebo survey items, and their child's provider received a summary of their responses; control providers remained blinded to parent VHP status. Our outcome was child immunization status at 8 months of age expressed as percent of days underimmunized. We compared outcomes in control and intervention participants using

resultsWe enrolled 24 clinics (12 in each arm) and 156 parents (65 in the intervention arm). Parent characteristics were similar across arms except more intervention (versus control) parents had a first-born child (60.9% vs 44%;

conclusionVaccine hesitancy screening was not significantly associated with days underimmunized.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination RefusalVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31597690
PMCPMC6855815
OpenAlexW2979351891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.