Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597561›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2019

Reasons for first line ART modification over the years during the ART scale up in Uganda.

B Castelnuovo, F Mubiru, I Kalule, A Kiragga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B CastelnuovoInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Mulago Hospital Complex, P.O. Box: 22418, Kampala, Uganda. bcastelnuovo@idi.co.ug.
F MubiruInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Mulago Hospital Complex, P.O. Box: 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
I KaluleInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Mulago Hospital Complex, P.O. Box: 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
A KiraggaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Mulago Hospital Complex, P.O. Box: 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Infectious Diseases Institute · UGMakerere University · UGMulago Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the initial scale up of ART in sub-Saharan Africa, prescribed regimens included drugs with high potential for toxicity (particularly stavudine). More recently a growing number of patients requires second line treatment due to treatment failure, especially following the expansion of viral load testing. We aim to determine the reasons and risk factors for modification of first line ART across the years.

methodsWe included patients started on standard first line ART (2NRTI + 1 NNRTI) between 2005 and 2016 at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda. We described the reasons for treatment modification categorized in (1) toxicity (2) treatment failure (3) other reason (new TB treatment, new pregnancy). We used Cox proportional hazard to identify factors associated with treatment modification due to toxicity.

resultsWe included 14,261 patients; 9114 (63.9%), were female, the median age was 34 years (IQR: 29-40), 60.8% were in WHO stage 3 and 4. The median BMI and CD4 count were 21.9 (IQR: 19.6-24.8) and 188 cell/µL (IQR: 65-353) respectively; 27.5% were started on stavudine, 46% on zidovudine, and 26.5% on a tenofovir containing regimens. We observed 6248 ART modifications in 4868/14,261 patients (34.1%); 1615 were due to toxicity, 1077 to treatment failure, 1330 to contraindications, and 1860 patients following WHO recommendation of phasing out stavudine and substituting with another NRTI. Modification for drug toxicity declined rapidly after the phase out of stavudine (2008), while switches to second line regimes increased after the implementation of viral load monitoring (2015). Patients with normal BMI compared to underweight, (HR: 0.79, CI 0.69-0.91), with CD4 counts 200-350 cells/µL compared to < 200 cells/µL (HR: 0.81- CI 0.71-0.93), and started on zidovudine (HR: 0.51 CI 0.44-0.59) and tenofovir (HR: 0.16, CI 0.14-0.22) compared to stavudine were less likely to have ART modification due to toxicity. Older patients (HR: 1.14 per 5-year increase CI 1.11-1.18), those in WHO stage 3 and 4 (HR: 1.19, CI 1.06-1.34) were more likely to have ART modification due to toxicity.

conclusionsToxicity as reason for drugs substitution decreased over time mirroring the phase out of stavudine, while viral load expansion identified more patients in need of second line treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsContraindications, DrugDrug SubstitutionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStavudineTreatment FailureUgandaViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsStavudineAntiretroviral treatment modificationsSub-Saharan AfricaToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31597561
PMCPMC6785877
OpenAlexW2980065933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.