Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597512›Full record

ArticleCognitive neuropsychology

Developmental differences in temporal schema acquisition impact reasoning decisions.

Athula Pudhiyidath, Hannah E Roome, Christine Coughlin, Kim V Nguyen, Alison R Preston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neuropsychology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The neural bases for timing of durations.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Athula PudhiyidathCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hannah E RoomeCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Christine CoughlinCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Kim V NguyenCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Alison R PrestonCenter for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory integrationR01MH100121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alison R Preston · 2013 to 2026
$7.3M
Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
Linking the neurobiological development of memory and reasoningR21HD083785 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2016 to 2017
$423k
Memory development and its influence on reasoning and prospectionF32MH115585 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI COUGHLIN, CHRISTINE A · 2017 to 2018
$116k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD083785NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH115585NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100121NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schemas capture patterns across multiple experiences, accumulating information about common event structures that guide decision making in new contexts. Schemas are an important principle of leading theories of cognitive development; yet, we know little about how children and adolescents form schemas and use schematic knowledge to guide decisions. Here, we show that the ability to acquire schematic knowledge based on the temporal regularities of events increases during childhood and adolescence. Furthermore, we show that temporally mediated schematic knowledge biases reasoning decisions in an age-dependent manner. Participants with greater temporal schematic knowledge were more likely to infer that temporally related items shared other, non-temporal properties, with adults showing the greatest relationship between schema knowledge and reasoning choices. These data indicate that the mechanisms underlying schema formation and expression are not fully developed until adulthood and may reflect the ongoing maturation of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex through adolescence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCognitionFemaleHumansMaleTemporal LobeYoung Adultcognitive mapsgeneralizationinductive inferenceStatistical learningtemporal memory

Identifiers

PMID31597512
PMCPMC7145737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.