Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597471›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2020

Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery.

Thomas J Sitzman, Adam C Carle, Jaclyn N Lundberg, Pamela C Heaton, Michael A Helmrath, Carroll-Ann Trotman, Maria T Britto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cleft Care India Study: A National Audit on Patients with Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Surgical Procedures and Outcomes.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Predictive Capabilities of the Asher-McDade Esthetic Index for Nasolabial Revision Surgery: A Pilot Study.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J SitzmanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-923X
Adam C CarleDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jaclyn N LundbergCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Pamela C HeatonJames L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michael A HelmrathDivision of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Carroll-Ann TrotmanDepartment of Orthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Maria T BrittoDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USCreighton University · USPhoenix Children's Hospital · USTufts University · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Understanding and Reducing Variation in Outcomes of Cleft Lip and Palate SurgeryK23DE025023 · NIDCR · PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SITZMAN, THOMAS JAMES · 2016 to 2020
$598k
NIDCR NIH HHS K23 DE025023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify child-, surgeon-, and hospital-specific factors at the time of primary cleft lip repair that are associated with the use of secondary cleft lip surgery.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingForty-nine pediatric hospitals.

participantsChildren who underwent cleft lip repair between 1999 and 2015.

main outcome measureTime from primary cleft lip repair to secondary lip surgery.

resultsBy 5 years after primary lip repair, 24.0% of children had undergone a secondary lip surgery. In multivariable analysis, primary lip repair before 3 months had a 1.22-fold increased hazard of secondary surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.46) compared to repair at 7 to 12 months of age, and children with multiple congenital anomalies had a 0.77-fold decreased hazard of secondary surgery (95% CI: 0.68-0.87). After adjusting for cleft type, age at repair, presence of multiple congenital anomalies, and procedure volume, there remained substantial variation in secondary surgery use among surgeons and hospitals (

conclusionsThere are substantial differences among surgeons and hospitals in the rates of secondary lip surgery. Further work is needed to identify causes for this variation among providers.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateSurgeonsChildChild, PreschoolHospitals, PediatricHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomecleft liphealth servicessecondary surgery

Identifiers

PMID31597471
PMCPMC6957675
OpenAlexW2979397481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.