Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31597208›Full record

ReviewBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2020

Understanding and interpreting community sequencing measurements of the vaginal microbiome.

H L Berman, M R McLaren, B J Callahan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The vaginal microbiome in HPV persistence and cervical cancer progression.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Insight into Vaginal Microbiome Techniques.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Critical reviews in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H L BermanDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
M R McLarenDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-473X
B J CallahanDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-117X

Funding

Quantitative Metagenomics and the Vaginal Microbiome of Preterm BirthR35GM133745 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Benjamin John Callahan · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-wide high-throughput sequencing has transformed the study of the vaginal microbiome, and clinical applications are on the horizon. Here we outline the three main community sequencing methods: (1) amplicon sequencing, (2) shotgun metagenomic sequencing, and (3) metatranscriptomic sequencing. We discuss the advantages and limitations of community sequencing generally, and the unique strengths and weaknesses of each method. We briefly review the contributions of community sequencing to vaginal microbiome research and practice. We develop suggestions for critically interpreting research results and potential clinical applications based on community sequencing of the vaginal microbiome. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: We review the advantages and limitations of amplicon sequencing, metagenomics, and metatranscriptomics methods for the study of the vaginal microbiome.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMicrobiotaReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneamplicon sequencingmetagenomicsmetatranscriptomicsvaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID31597208
PMCPMC10801814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.