Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31596905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Defective base excision repair in the response to DNA damaging agents in triple negative breast cancer.

Kevin J Lee, Cortt G Piett, Joel F Andrews, Elise Mann, Zachary D Nagel, Natalie R Gassman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Haematologica · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Unboxing the molecular modalities of mutagens in cancer.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin J LeeMitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States of America.
Cortt G PiettHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Joel F AndrewsMitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States of America.
Elise MannUniversity of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, United States of America.
Zachary D NagelHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Natalie R GassmanMitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-2332
USA Mitchell Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

Transcription-Coupled & Replication-Associated Excision RepairP01CA092584 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WALTER J. CHAZIN · 2001 to 2026
$89.6M
Co-detection of DNA adducts and methylation sites as predictive biomarkers for exposuresR21ES028015 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI EBENSTEIN, YUVAL, GASSMAN, NATALIE ROSE · 2017 to 2018
$389k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA092584NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES028015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair defects have been increasingly focused on as therapeutic targets. In hormone-positive breast cancer, XRCC1-deficient tumors have been identified and proposed as targets for combination therapies that damage DNA and inhibit DNA repair pathways. XRCC1 is a scaffold protein that functions in base excision repair (BER) by mediating essential interactions between DNA glycosylases, AP endonuclease, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, DNA polymerase β (POL β), and DNA ligases. Loss of XRCC1 confers BER defects and hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents. BER defects have not been evaluated in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), for which new therapeutic targets and therapies are needed. To evaluate the potential of XRCC1 as an indicator of BER defects in TNBC, we examined XRCC1 expression in the TCGA database and its expression and localization in TNBC cell lines. The TCGA database revealed high XRCC1 expression in TNBC tumors and TNBC cell lines show variable, but mostly high expression of XRCC1. XRCC1 localized outside of the nucleus in some TNBC cell lines, altering their ability to repair base lesions and single-strand breaks. Subcellular localization of POL β also varied and did not correlate with XRCC1 localization. Basal levels of DNA damage correlated with observed changes in XRCC1 expression, localization, and measure repair capacity. The results confirmed that XRCC1 expression changes indicate DNA repair capacity changes but emphasize that basal DNA damage levels along with protein localization are better indicators of DNA repair defects. Given the observed over-expression of XRCC1 in TNBC preclinical models and tumors, XRCC1 expression levels should be assessed when evaluating treatment responses of TNBC preclinical model cells.

Indexed as

DNA RepairCell LineCell Line, TumorDNA DamageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansProtein TransportTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsX-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1XRCC1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31596905
PMCPMC6785058
OpenAlexW2979960006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.