Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31596851›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Selecting behaviour change priorities for trachoma 'F' and 'E' interventions: A formative research study in Oromia, Ethiopia.

Katie Greenland, Sian White, Katina Sommers, Adam Biran, Matthew J Burton, Virginia Sarah, Wondu Alemayehu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trachoma risk factors in Oromia Region, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Flies as possible vectors of inflammatory trachoma transmission in a Brazilian municipality.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie GreenlandDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-0377
Sian WhiteDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Katina SommersDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-0869
Adam BiranDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Virginia SarahPartnerships and Advocacy, The Fred Hollows Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Wondu AlemayehuBerhan Public Health and Eye Care Consultancy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206275/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrachoma is the leading infectious cause of blindness. However, little is known about the behavioural and environmental determinants of transmission of the causative organism, Chlamydia trachomatis. We conducted formative research in a trachoma hyper-endemic area of Ethiopia to explore the behaviours which are likely to contribute to trachoma transmission and map their determinants. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsData on water use, hygiene, defecation, and sleeping arrangements were collected from five communities during the dry and rainy seasons in 2016. Data collection involved direct observation in households (n = 20), interviews with caregivers (n = 20) and focus group discussions (n = 11). Although several behaviours that likely contribute to trachoma transmission were identified, no single behaviour stood out as the dominant contributor. Hygiene practices reflected high levels of poverty and water scarcity. Face washing and soap use varied within and between households, and were associated with other factors such as school attendance. Children's faces were rarely wiped to remove nasal or ocular discharge, which was not perceived to be socially undesirable. Bathing and laundry were performed infrequently due to the amount of time and water required. Open defecation was a normative practice, particularly for young children. Latrines, when present, were poorly constructed, maintained and used. Young children and parents slept closely together and shared bedding that was infrequently washed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Existing norms and enabling factors in this context favour the development of interventions to improve facial cleanliness as more feasible than those that reduce unsafe faeces disposal. Interventions to increase the frequency of bathing and laundry may also be infeasible unless water availability within the home is improved.

Indexed as

HygieneAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisDefecationEnvironmental HealthEthiopiaFaceFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth BehaviorHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID31596851
PMCPMC6785218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.