ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019
Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise-invariant representations of sound emerge along the canonical cortical hierarchy.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Impact of hearing loss on brain signal variability in older adults under different auditory load conditions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Gamma-band-based dynamic functional connectivity in pigeon entopallium during sample presentation in a delayed color matching task.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Aging effects on dual-route speech processing networks during speech perception in noise.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Cortical Responses Time-Locked to Continuous Speech in the High-Gamma Band Depend on Selective Attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Cortical responses time-locked to continuous speech in the high-gamma band depend on selective attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- On the Role of Neural Oscillations Across Timescales in Speech and Music Processing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Time-locked auditory cortical responses in the high-gamma band: A window into primary auditory cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Exaggerated cortical representation of speech in older listeners: mutual information analysis.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Younger adults with normal hearing can typically understand speech in the presence of a competing speaker without much effort, but this ability to understand speech in challenging conditions deteriorates with age. Older adults, even with clinically normal hearing, often have problems understanding speech in noise. Earlier auditory studies using the frequency-following response (FFR), primarily believed to be generated by the midbrain, demonstrated age-related neural deficits when analyzed with traditional measures. Here we use a mutual information paradigm to analyze the FFR to speech (masked by a competing speech signal) by estimating the amount of stimulus information contained in the FFR. Our results show, first, a broadband informational loss associated with aging for both FFR amplitude and phase. Second, this age-related loss of information is more severe in higher-frequency FFR bands (several hundred hertz). Third, the mutual information between the FFR and the stimulus decreases as noise level increases for both age groups. Fourth, older adults benefit neurally, i.e., show a reduction in loss of information, when the speech masker is changed from meaningful (talker speaking a language that they can comprehend, such as English) to meaningless (talker speaking a language that they cannot comprehend, such as Dutch). This benefit is not seen in younger listeners, which suggests that age-related informational loss may be more severe when the speech masker is meaningful than when it is meaningless. In summary, as a method, mutual information analysis can unveil new results that traditional measures may not have enough statistical power to assess.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.