Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31596475›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

FullMeSH: improving large-scale MeSH indexing with full text.

Suyang Dai, Ronghui You, Zhiyong Lu, Xiaodi Huang, Hiroshi Mamitsuka, Shanfeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Goals and strategies for the indexing of publication types and study designs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scientometric analysis of trends in global research on acne treatment.International journal of women's dermatology · 2023
    Article
  7. LitCovid ensemble learning for COVID-19 multi-label classification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suyang DaiSchool of Computer Science and Shanghai Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ronghui YouSchool of Computer Science and Shanghai Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Xiaodi HuangSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
Hiroshi MamitsukaBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan.
Shanfeng ZhuSchool of Computer Science and Shanghai Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

Query Log Analysis for Improving User Access to NCBI Web ServicesZIALM000001 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2011 to 2021
$12.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWith the rapidly growing biomedical literature, automatically indexing biomedical articles by Medical Subject Heading (MeSH), namely MeSH indexing, has become increasingly important for facilitating hypothesis generation and knowledge discovery. Over the past years, many large-scale MeSH indexing approaches have been proposed, such as Medical Text Indexer, MeSHLabeler, DeepMeSH and MeSHProbeNet. However, the performance of these methods is hampered by using limited information, i.e. only the title and abstract of biomedical articles.

resultsWe propose FullMeSH, a large-scale MeSH indexing method taking advantage of the recent increase in the availability of full text articles. Compared to DeepMeSH and other state-of-the-art methods, FullMeSH has three novelties: (i) Instead of using a full text as a whole, FullMeSH segments it into several sections with their normalized titles in order to distinguish their contributions to the overall performance. (ii) FullMeSH integrates the evidence from different sections in a 'learning to rank' framework by combining the sparse and deep semantic representations. (iii) FullMeSH trains an Attention-based Convolutional Neural Network for each section, which achieves better performance on infrequent MeSH headings. FullMeSH has been developed and empirically trained on the entire set of 1.4 million full-text articles in the PubMed Central Open Access subset. It achieved a Micro F-measure of 66.76% on a test set of 10 000 articles, which was 3.3% and 6.4% higher than DeepMeSH and MeSHLabeler, respectively. Furthermore, FullMeSH demonstrated an average improvement of 4.7% over DeepMeSH for indexing Check Tags, a set of most frequently indexed MeSH headings. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available upon request. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Abstracting and IndexingMedical Subject HeadingsMEDLINEPubMedSemanticsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31596475
PMCPMC7523651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.