Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31596383›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2019

Indicators of chronic noncommunicable diseases in women of reproductive age that are beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of Bolsa Família.

Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal, Mariana Santos Felisbino-Mendes, Quéren Hapuque de Carvalho, Jill Pell, Ruth Dundas, Alastair Leyland, Mauricio Lima Barreto, Deborah Carvalho Malta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Regina Tomie Ivata BernalPrograma de Pós-Graduação, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-3857
Mariana Santos Felisbino-MendesPrograma de Pós-Graduação, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-5708
Quéren Hapuque de CarvalhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-6041
Jill PellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow - Glasgow, Escócia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-7035
Ruth DundasMedical Research Council/ Chief Scientific Office (MRC/CSO), Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow - Glasgow, Escócia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-4286
Alastair LeylandMedical Research Council/ Chief Scientific Office (MRC/CSO), Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow - Glasgow, Escócia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-7099
Mauricio Lima BarretoCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Salvador (BA), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-4930
Deborah Carvalho MaltaPrograma de Pós-Graduação, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-5734
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRChief Scientist Office · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of noncommunicable disease (NCD) indicators, including laboratory tests, in the population of Brazilian women of reproductive age, according to whether or not they receive the Bolsa Família (BF) benefit.

methodsA total of 3,131 women aged 18 to 49 years old who participated in the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde ) laboratory examination sub-sample were considered. We compared indicators among women of reproductive age (18 to 49 years old) who reported receiving BF or not, and calculated prevalence and confidence intervals, using Pearson's χ2.

resultsWomen of reproductive age who were beneficiaries of BF had worse health outcomes, such as a greater occurrence of being overweight (33.5%) and obese (26.9%) (p < 0.001), having hypertension (13.4% versus 4.4%, p < 0.001), used more tobacco (11.2% versus 8.2%, p = 0.029), and perceived their health as worse (6.2% versus 2.4%, p < 0.001).

conclusionSeveral NCD indicators were worse among women of childbearing age who were beneficiaries of BF. It should be emphasized that this is not a causal relationship, with BF being a marker of inequalities among women. The benefit has been directed to the population with greater health needs, and seeks to reduce inequities.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrazilChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesPrevalencePublic AssistanceReference ValuesReproductionRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31596383
PMCPMC6892639
OpenAlexW2977508595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.