Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31596145›Full record

SynthesisJournal of diabetes science and technology2020

Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: The Value of Using Microclimate Sensor Arrays.

Petra Jones, Richard Bibb, Melanie Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Matthew McCarthy, David Webb, Francesco Zaccardi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petra JonesLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-9168
Richard BibbLoughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Melanie DaviesLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Matthew McCarthyLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
David WebbLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Francesco ZaccardiLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately predicting the risk of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) could dramatically reduce the enormous burden of chronic wound management and amputation. Yet, the current prognostic models are unable to precisely predict DFU events. Typically, efforts have focused on individual factors like temperature, pressure, or shear rather than the overall foot microclimate.

methodsA systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed reports with no restrictions on start date covering the literature published until February 20, 2019 using relevant keywords, including temperature, pressure, shear, and relative humidity. We review the use of these variables as predictors of DFU, highlighting gaps in our current understanding and suggesting which specific features should be combined to develop a real-time microclimate prognostic model.

resultsThe current prognostic models rely either solely on contralateral temperature, pressure, or shear measurement; these parameters, however, rarely reach 50% specificity in relation to DFU. There is also considerable variation in methodological investigation, anatomical sensor configuration, and resting time prior to temperature measurements (5-20 minutes). Few studies have considered relative humidity and mean skin resistance.

conclusionVery limited evidence supports the use of single clinical parameters in predicting the risk of DFU. We suggest that the microclimate as a whole should be considered to predict DFU more effectively and suggest nine specific features which appear to be implicated for further investigation. Technology supports real-time in-shoe data collection and wireless transmission, providing a potentially rich source of data to better predict the risk of DFU.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootFootHumansMicroclimatePrognosisfootmicroclimateneuropathysensorsulcer

Identifiers

PMID31596145
PMCPMC7189165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.