ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019
T2* mapping and subregion analysis of the tibialis posterior tendon using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in the cross-sectional area along the ankle tendons with both age and sex.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection of tibialis posterior tendon changes and appropriate intervention is necessary to prevent disease progression to flat-foot deformity and foot/ankle dysfunction, and the need for operative treatment. Currently, differentiating between early-stage tibialis posterior tendon deficiency patients who will benefit from conservative
methods26 asymptomatic volunteers underwent T2* mapping. The tendon was divided axially into seven subregions. Summary statistics for T2* within each subregion were calculated and compared using Tukey post-hoc pairwise comparisons.
resultsResults are reported for 24 subjects. The mean tibialis posterior tendon T2* was 7 ± 1 ms. Subregion values ranged from 6 ± 1 to 9 ± 2 ms with significant between-region differences in T2*. Inter- and intrarater absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were all "excellent" (0.75 < ICC=1.00) except for regions 5 through 7, which had "fair to good" interrater and/or and intrarater ICC values (0.4 < ICC=0.75).
conclusionA tibialis posterior tendon T2* mapping protocol, subregion division method, and baseline T2* values for clinically relevant regions were established. Significant differences in T2* were observed along the tendon length. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work demonstrates that regional variation exists and should be considered for future T2*-based research on posterior tibias tendon degeneration and when using T2* mapping to evaluate for potential tibialis posterior tendon degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.