Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595600›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2020

Positive response to galcanezumab following treatment failure to onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: post hoc analyses of three randomized double-blind studies.

J Ailani, E Pearlman, Q Zhang, A J Nagy, K Schuh, S K Aurora

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J AilaniMedStar Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
E PearlmanLilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Q ZhangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A J NagyNevada Headache Institute, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
K SchuhLilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S K AuroraEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9425-1710

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHumanized monoclonal antibody galcanezumab, which binds to calcitonin-gene-related peptide, has shown efficacy for episodic and chronic migraine prevention. These analyses evaluated galcanezumab response for migraine headache prevention in patients who previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA ('nonresponse' or 'inadequate response' or safety reasons).

methodsPost hoc analyses included data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 episodic or chronic migraine studies; 2886 patients randomly received 120 or 240 mg galcanezumab or placebo. During double-blind periods the study drug was administered subcutaneously once a month for 6 months in EVOLVE-1 and -2 and for 3 months in REGAIN. The 120 mg groups received a 240 mg loading dose at month 1. Pooled analyses included 129 patients who failed onabotulinumtoxinA. Using mixed effect model repeat measurements, the least squares mean change from baseline in the number of migraine headache days (MHDs) was calculated for the first 3 months of treatment.

resultsFor pooled analyses, significant decreases from baseline in the number of MHDs were observed for 120 mg (-3.91) and 240 mg (-5.27) galcanezumab overall versus placebo (-0.88) across 3-month time points for patients who failed onabotulinumtoxinA. Corresponding data for patients with chronic migraine showed significant decreases: 120 mg (-3.18) and 240 mg (-4.26) galcanezumab versus placebo (0.16). Significant reductions in the number of MHDs per month with acute medication use included 120 mg galcanezumab (-4.35) and 240 mg galcanezumab (-4.55) versus placebo (-0.83). Estimates of ≥50% response during months 1-3 were 9.4% for placebo, 41.3% for 120 mg galcanezumab and 47.5% for 240 mg galcanezumab.

conclusionGalcanezumab is an option for prevention of migraine in patients who have previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA preventive therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBotulinum Toxins, Type Agalcanezumabonabotulinum toxin Acalcitonin gene-related peptidegalcanezumabmigraineonabotulinumtoxinAtreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID31595600
PMCPMC7028018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.