Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595498›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

Development and application of a survey instrument to measure collaboration among health care and social services organizations.

Amanda L Brewster, Annabel X Tan, Christina T Yuan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07528846 (Justice Community Overdose Innovation Network II TCU Hub), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07528846 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Justice Community Overdose Innovation Network II TCU Hub: TCU Building Resilient Initiatives for Deflection Through Greater Engagement Project (TCU BRIDGE to Deflection Project)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Christian UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled1,620ConditionsSubstance Use Disorder (SUD), Drug Overdose, Criminal BehaviorArmsCore-interagency community engagement approach, Enhanced-Core plus community engagement specialist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and testing of the capacity of organisations for system practices scale.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L BrewsterBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-5830
Annabel X TanStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Christina T YuanJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-9568
Berkeley Public Health Division · USJohns Hopkins University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Commonwealth Fund 20160724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure strategies of interorganizational collaboration among health care and social service organizations that serve older adults. STUDY

settingTwenty Hospital Service Areas (HSAs) in the United States. STUDY

designWe developed and validated a novel scale to characterize interorganizational collaboration, and then tested its application by assessing whether the scale differentiated between HSAs with high vs low performance on potentially avoidable health care use and spending for Medicare beneficiaries. DATA COLLECTION: Health care and social service organizations (N = 173 total) in each HSA completed a 12-item collaboration scale, three questions about collaboration behaviors, and a detailed survey documenting collaborative network ties. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe identified two distinguishable subscales of interorganizational collaboration: (a) Aligning Strategy and (b) Coordinating Current Work. Each subscale demonstrated convergent validity with the organization's position in the collaborative network, and with collaboration behaviors. The full scale and Coordinating Current Work subscale did not differentiate high- vs low-performing HSAs, but the Aligning Strategy subscale was significantly higher in high-performing HSAs than in low-performing HSAs (P = .01).

conclusionsCross-sector collaboration-and particularly Aligning Strategy-is associated with health care use and spending for older adults. This new survey measure could be used to track the impact of interventions to foster interorganizational collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterinstitutional RelationsReproducibility of ResultsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedSocial WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescross-sector collaborationolder adultssocial determinants of healthsurvey instrument

Identifiers

PMID31595498
PMCPMC6863239
OpenAlexW2979691251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.