ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2020
Comparative Physicochemical and Biological Characterisation of the Similar Biological Medicinal Product Teriparatide and Its Reference Medicinal Product.
Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical Similarity Assessment of Biosimilars: Global Regulatory Landscape, Recent Studies and Major Advancements in Orthogonal Platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn January 2017, the European Commission approved Terrosa
objectiveThe objective of this paper is to summarise the results of the comparative analysis of representative batches of both the RGB-10 drug product and the reference medicinal product performed by physicochemical and in vitro biological methods.
methodsA series of state-of-the-art analytical methods were applied in a comparative head-to-head manner for testing the similarity in respect to purity, content, structure and potency.
resultsBased on the results of the comprehensive physicochemical and biological characterisation, RGB-10 proved to be highly similar to the reference medicinal product with respect to the critical quality attributes investigated.
conclusionThe results of the quality comparability study demonstrated similarity of RGB-10 to the reference medicinal product, providing the scientific basis for conducting a specifically designed clinical programme, and supported registration of the Marketing Authorisation Application of RGB-10 in the EU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.