Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595452›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

A validation study of the ICECAP-O in informal carers of people with dementia from eight European Countries.

Meg Perry-Duxbury, Job van Exel, Werner Brouwer, Anders Sköldunger, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Kate Irving, Gabriele Meyer, Geir Selbæk, Bob Woods, Orazio Zanetti and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Meg Perry-DuxburyErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. perryduxbury@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-2457
Job van ExelErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-1777
Werner BrouwerErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-8397
Anders SköldungerKarolinska Institutet, Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-2248
Manuel Gonçalves-PereiraCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre NOVA Medical School/Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-1306
Kate IrvingSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Gabriele MeyerMedical Faculty, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Geir SelbækNorwegian National Advisory Unit ON Ageing and Health, Vestfold Health Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-8219
Bob WoodsDementia Services Development Centre Wales (DSDC), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Orazio ZanettiIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Frans VerheyAlzheimer Center Limburg, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-8406
Anders WimoKarolinska Institutet, Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-5750
Ron L H HandelsKarolinska Institutet, Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-0630
Actifcare Consortium
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEBangor University · GBCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITDublin City University · IEMaastricht University · NLMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEOslo University Hospital · NOUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe pressure on healthcare budgets remains high, partially due to the ageing population. Economic evaluation can be a helpful tool to inform resource allocation in publicly financed systems. Such evaluations frequently use health-related outcome measures. However, in areas such as care of older people, improving health outcomes is not necessarily the main focus of care interventions and broader outcome measures, including outcomes for those providing informal care, may be preferred when evaluating such interventions. This paper validates a recently introduced well-being measure, the ICECAP-O, in a population of informal carers for people with dementia from eight European countries.

methodsConvergent and discriminant validity tests were performed to validate the ICECAP-O using data obtained in a sample of 451 respondents from Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and the UK. These respondents completed a number of standardized questionnaires within the framework of the Actifcare project.

resultsThe ICECAP-O performed well among informal carers, in terms of both convergent and discriminant validity. In the multivariate analysis, it was found to be significantly associated with the age of the person with dementia, EQ-5D-5L health problem index of the person with dementia, carer-patient relationship, care recipient CDR, carer LSNS Score, the PAI score, and Perseverance Time.

conclusionThe ICECAP-O appears to be a valid measure of well-being in informal carers for people with dementia. The ICECAP-O may therefore be useful as an outcome measure in economic evaluations of interventions aimed at such informal carers, when these aim to improve well-being beyond health.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDementiaEuropeFemaleHumansMalePatient CareQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesConstruct validityDementiaICECAP-OInformal careWell-being

Identifiers

PMID31595452
PMCPMC6962282
OpenAlexW2979777433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.