Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595451›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

A comparison of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms in terms of accuracy and number of items administrated using PROMIS profile.

Eisuke Segawa, Benjamin Schalet, David Cella

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06396702 (Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06396702 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement (EASE) Intervention for the Management of Emotional and Physical Symptoms Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2024 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsTransplant, Failure,Kidney, Transplant, Failure, HeartArmsEASE-SOT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reducing patient burden of PROMs in healthcare through advanced computerized adaptive testing stopping rules.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  12. Putting CATs and item banks to work: How to construct predictive and sensitive PROMIS screeners for use in ambulatory oncology.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  13. Mapping and Linking between the EQ-5D-5L and the PROMIS Domains in the United States.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations of Pretransplant Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Score With Kidney Transplant Outcomes.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nurturing Longitudinal Samples 2.0.Western journal of nursing research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eisuke SegawaSK Data, Chicago, USA. eisuke.segawa@gmail.com.
Benjamin SchaletDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
NIH PROMIS Statistical Coordinating Center(RMI)U01AR052177 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2004 to 2010
$10.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052177NIH HHS U2CCA186878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), seven domains (Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Function, and Pain Interference) are packaged together as profiles. Each of these domains can also be assessed using computer adaptive tests (CATs) or short forms (SFs) of varying length (e.g., 4, 6, and 8 items). We compared the accuracy and number of items administrated of CAT versus each SF.

methodsPROMIS instruments are scored using item response theory (IRT) with graded response model and reported as T scores (mean = 50, SD = 10). We simulated 10,000 subjects from the normal distribution with mean 60 for symptom scales and 40 for function scales, and standard deviation 10 in each domain. We considered a subject's score to be accurate when the standard error (SE) was less than 3.0. We recorded range of accurate scores (accurate range) and the number of items administrated.

resultsThe average number of items administrated in CAT was 4.7 across all domains. The accurate range was wider for CAT compared to all SFs in each domain. CAT was notably better at extending the accurate range into very poor health for Fatigue, Physical Function, and Pain Interference. Most SFs provided reasonably wide accurate range.

conclusionsRelative to SFs, CATs provided the widest accurate range, with slightly more items than SF4 and less than SF6 and SF8. Most SFs, especially longer ones, provided reasonably wide accurate range.

Indexed as

AdultComputer-Aided DesignFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeComputer adaptive testing (CAT)Item response theoryPROMISShort form

Identifiers

PMID31595451
OpenAlexW2980074836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.