Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595382›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020

Adrenalectomy: should urologists not be doing more?

Jay G Fuletra, Amber L Schilling, Daniel Canter, Christopher S Hollenbeak, Jay D Raman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perioperative outcomes of adrenal surgery Does surgical specialty matter?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgical and functional outcomes of adrenalectomy by urologists: A 17-year cohort review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jay G FuletraDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.
Amber L SchillingDivision of Outcomes Research and Quality, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Daniel CanterDepartment of Urology, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Christopher S HollenbeakDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
Jay D RamanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, USA. jraman@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8480-8397
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USOchsner Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdrenalectomy is an operation performed by both urologists and general surgeons; however, the majority are performed by general surgeons. We investigated whether there was a difference in outcomes based on surgical specialty performing the procedure. If no differences exist, an argument can be made that urologists should be doing more adrenalectomies.

methodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Participant Use File (PUF) was queried to extract all cases of adrenalectomies performed from 2011 to 2015. Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes 60540 and 60650 were used. The data were stratified by surgical specialty performing the adrenalectomy (urology or general surgery). Our outcomes of interest included post-surgical complications, reoperations, 30-day readmission, mortality, and hospital length of stay.

resultsA total of 3358 patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 2011 and 2015 were included. General surgeons performed 90% of these (n = 3012) and urologists performed 10% (n = 334). Differences in number of post-surgical complications, length of stay, rate of reoperation, 30-day readmission, and mortality were not statistically significant between general surgeons and urologists (p = 0.76, p = 0.29, p = 0.37, p = 0.98, and p = 0.59, respectively). Small complication rates disallowed multivariable analyses, but unadjusted rates for reoperation, presence of any post-operative complication, readmission within 30 days, and mortality were similar between specialties.

conclusionsSurgical specialty did not make a difference in outcomes for patients undergoing adrenalectomy, despite a large disparity in the number of procedures performed by general surgeons versus urologists. Urologists should continue performing adrenalectomies and, given their familiarity with the retroperitoneum, perhaps perform more than is the current trend.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenalectomyAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationUnited StatesUrologyAdrenalectomyComparing specialtiesComplicationsNSQIPOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID31595382
OpenAlexW2979542506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.