Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595337›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.

Pedro C Brauner, Dominik Müller, Willem S Molenaar, Albrecht E Melchinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Transferability of genomic prediction models across market segments in potato and the effect of selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing selection based on BLUPs or BLUEs in multiple sets of genotypes differing in their population parameters.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  6. Phenomic Selection for Hybrid Rapeseed Breeding.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The performance of phenomic selection depends on the genetic architecture of the target trait.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Intercontinental trials reveal stable QTL for Northern corn leaf blight resistance in Europe and in Brazil.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro C Brauner *Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Sciences and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 21, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Dominik Müller *Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Sciences and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 21, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Willem S MolenaarInstitute of Plant Breeding, Seed Sciences and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 21, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Albrecht E MelchingerInstitute of Plant Breeding, Seed Sciences and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 21, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany. melchinger@uni-hohenheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-873X

Funding

German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) MAZE ID: 031B0195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageFor genomic prediction within biparental families using multiple biparental families, combined training sets comprising full-sibs from the same family and half-sib families are recommended to reach high and robust prediction accuracy, whereas inclusion of unrelated families is risky and can have negative effects. In recycling breeding, where elite inbreds are recombined to generate new source material, genomic and phenotypic information from lines of numerous biparental families (BPFs) is commonly available for genomic prediction (GP). For each BPF with a large number of candidates in the prediction set (PS), the training set (TS) can be composed of lines from the same full-sib family or multiple related and unrelated families to increase the TS size. GP was applied to BPFs generated in silico and from two published experiments to evaluate the prediction accuracy ([Formula: see text]) of different TS compositions. We compared [Formula: see text] for individual pairs of BPFs using as TS either full-sib, half-sib, or unrelated BPFs. While full-sibs yielded highly positive [Formula: see text] and half-sibs also mostly positive [Formula: see text] values, unrelated families had often negative [Formula: see text], and including these families in a combined TS reduced [Formula: see text]. By simulations, we demonstrated that optimized TS compositions exist, yielding 5-10% higher [Formula: see text] than the TS including all available BPFs. However, identification of poorly predictive families and finding the optimal TS composition with various quantitative-genetic parameters estimated from available data was not successful. Therefore, we suggest omitting unrelated families and combining in the TS full-sib and few half-sib families produced by specific mating designs, with a medium number (~ 50) of genotypes per family. This helps in balancing high [Formula: see text] in GP with a sufficient effective population size of the entire breeding program for securing high short- and long-term selection progress.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsGenetic LinkageZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31595337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.