Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595324›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2019

Understanding TCR affinity, antigen specificity, and cross-reactivity to improve TCR gene-modified T cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Timothy T Spear, Brian D Evavold, Brian M Baker, Michael I Nishimura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unbiased avidity-based isolation of antigen-specific T cells.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cytotoxic CD4Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy T SpearDepartment of Surgery, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Ave, Bldg 112, Room 308, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA. tspear@luc.edu.
Brian D EvavoldDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Brian M BakerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46530, USA.
Michael I NishimuraDepartment of Surgery, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Ave, Bldg 112, Room 308, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.

Funding

TCR TRANSDUCED CDB T CELLS FOR ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPYP01CA154778 · NCI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI NISHIMURA, MICHAEL I. · 2011 to 2015
$15.4M
Building better T cell receptors for targeted immunotherapyR01AI129543 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BAKER, BRIAN M, NISHIMURA, MICHAEL I. · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
Evolution of CD8+ TCR affinity during chronic viral infectionR01AI096879 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI EVAVOLD, BRIAN D · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
TCR Gene Transfer for Treating HCV-Associated MalignanciesF30CA180731 · NCI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI SPEAR, TIMOTHY · 2014 to 2018
$154k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA180731NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154778NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154779NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI096879NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI129543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) using T cell receptor (TCR) gene-modified T cells is an exciting and rapidly evolving field. Numerous preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated various levels of feasibility, safety, and efficacy using TCR-engineered T cells to treat cancer and viral infections. Although evidence suggests their use can be effective, to what extent and how to improve these therapeutics are still matters of investigation. As TCR affinity has been generally accepted as the central role in defining T cell specificity and sensitivity, selection for and generation of high affinity TCRs has remained a fundamental approach to design more potent T cells. However, traditional methods for affinity-enhancement by random mutagenesis can induce undesirable cross-reactivity causing on- and off-target adverse events, generate exhausted effectors by overstimulation, and ignore other kinetic and cellular parameters that have been shown to impact antigen specificity. In this Focussed Research Review, we comment on the preclinical and clinical potential of TCR gene-modified T cells, summarize our contributions challenging the role TCR affinity plays in antigen recognition, and explore how structure-guided design can be used to manipulate antigen specificity and TCR cross-reactivity to improve the safety and efficacy of TCR gene-modified T cells used in ACT.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntibody SpecificityCross ReactionsCytotoxicity, ImmunologicGenes, T-Cell ReceptorHumansNeoplasmsT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityT-LymphocytesAdoptive cell transferPIVAC 18T cellT cell receptor (TCR)TCR affinityTCR cross-reactivity

Identifiers

PMID31595324
PMCPMC11028285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.