Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595305›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2019

The potential of cerebrospinal fluid-based liquid biopsy approaches in CNS tumors.

Austin K Mattox, Hai Yan, Chetan Bettegowda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Austin K MattoxLudwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hai YanThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Chetan BettegowdaLudwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Multi-analyte Approach for Earlier Detection of Cancers in Non Plasma BiofluidsU01CA230691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Nishant Agrawal, CHETAN BETTEGOWDA · 2018 to 2026
$6.7M
Interrogating malignant gliomas using released tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluidR37CA230400 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BETTEGOWDA, CHETAN · 2018 to 2024
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS R37 CA230400NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be the best hope for minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment monitoring of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. Discovery/validation of cell-free nucleic acid and protein biomarkers has the potential to revolutionize CNS cancer care, paving the way for presurgical evaluation, earlier detection of recurrence, and the selection of targeted therapies. While detection of mutations, changes in RNA and miRNA expression, epigenetic alterations, and elevations of protein levels have been detected in the CSF of patients with CNS tumors, most of these biomarkers remain unvalidated. In this review, we focus on the molecular changes that have been identified in a variety of CNS tumors and profile the approaches used to detect these alterations in clinical samples. We further emphasize the importance of systemic collection of CSF and the establishment of standardized collection protocols that will lead to better cross-study biomarker validation and hopefully FDA-approved clinical markers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkercerebrospinal fluidcirculating tumor DNACNS tumorsliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID31595305
PMCPMC6917400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.