Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31595034›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2021

Predicting risk for Alcohol Use Disorder using longitudinal data with multimodal biomarkers and family history: a machine learning study.

Sivan Kinreich, Jacquelyn L Meyers, Adi Maron-Katz, Chella Kamarajan, Ashwini K Pandey, David B Chorlian, Jian Zhang, Gayathri Pandey, Stacey Subbie-Saenz de Viteri, Dan Pitti and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Use of Machine Learning to Predict Offline Adolescent e-Cigarette Use: a Proof-of-Concept.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Classification of Alcohol Use Disorder With Explainable AI.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sivan KinreichDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA. sivan.kinreich@downstate.edu.
Jacquelyn L MeyersDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Adi Maron-KatzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chella KamarajanDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Ashwini K PandeyDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
David B ChorlianDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Gayathri PandeyDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Stacey Subbie-Saenz de ViteriDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Dan PittiDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Andrey P AnokhinDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lance BauerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-1611
Victor HesselbrockDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Marc A SchuckitDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Howard J EdenbergDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-9690
Bernice PorjeszDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
State University of New York · USUniversity of Connecticut · USIndiana University School of MedicineStanford University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Subject CollectionU10AA008401 · NIAAA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI JAY Arnold TISCHFIELD · 1989 to 2026
$162.7M
Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD)U24AG021886 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI TATIANA M. FOROUD · 2002 to 2026
$119.8M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
JH/CIDR Genotyping for Genome-Wide Association StudiesU01HG004438 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$24.2M
Aging of Male Germline Stem CellsR01AG024992 · NIA · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ORWIG, KYLE EDWIN · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
DELINEATING THE ROLE OF GENETIC INFLUENCES ON CANNABIS INVOLVEMENTK02DA032573 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AGRAWAL, ARPANA · 2012 to 2021
$1.1M
Genetics, Romantic Relationships, and Alcohol Misuse in Emerging AdulthoodK01AA024152 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SALVATORE, JESSICA E · 2016 to 2020
$741k
Gene-Environment Interaction for Cannabis Use Disorders in Blacks and Whites in the U.S.K01DA037914 · NIDA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI MEYERS, JACQUELYN LEIGH · 2015 to 2019
$573k
DEVELOPMENT OF A COGNITIVE SCREENING BATTERY FOR AGEDR43AG008401 · NIA · POWELL ASSOCIATES · PI WURGAFT, LEWIS D · 1989 to 1989
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004438NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200782096CNIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024152NIAAA NIH HHS U10 AA008401NIA NIH HHS U24 AG021886NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037914NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA032573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive models have succeeded in distinguishing between individuals with Alcohol use Disorder (AUD) and controls. However, predictive models identifying who is prone to develop AUD and the biomarkers indicating a predisposition to AUD are still unclear. Our sample (n = 656) included offspring and non-offspring of European American (EA) and African American (AA) ancestry from the Collaborative Study of the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) who were recruited as early as age 12 and were unaffected at first assessment and reassessed years later as AUD (DSM-5) (n = 328) or unaffected (n = 328). Machine learning analysis was performed for 220 EEG measures, 149 alcohol-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a recent large Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of alcohol use/misuse and two family history (mother DSM-5 AUD and father DSM-5 AUD) features using supervised, Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to test which features assessed before developing AUD predict those who go on to develop AUD. Age, gender, and ancestry stratified analyses were performed. Results indicate significant and higher accuracy rates for the AA compared with the EA prediction models and a higher model accuracy trend among females compared with males for both ancestries. Combined EEG and SNP features model outperformed models based on only EEG features or only SNP features for both EA and AA samples. This multidimensional superiority was confirmed in a follow-up analysis in the AA age groups (12-15, 16-19, 20-30) and EA age group (16-19). In both ancestry samples, the youngest age group achieved higher accuracy score than the two other older age groups. Maternal AUD increased the model's accuracy in both ancestries' samples. Several discriminative EEG measures and SNPs features were identified, including lower posterior gamma, higher slow wave connectivity (delta, theta, alpha), higher frontal gamma ratio, higher beta correlation in the parietal area, and 5 SNPs: rs4780836, rs2605140, rs11690265, rs692854, and rs13380649. Results highlight the significance of sampling uniformity followed by stratified (e.g., ancestry, gender, developmental period) analysis, and wider selection of features, to generate better prediction scores allowing a more accurate estimation of AUD development.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAgedBiomarkersBlack or African AmericanChildFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMachine LearningMaleUnited StatesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31595034
PMCPMC7138692
OpenAlexW2979349116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.