ArticleMolecular psychiatry2021
Predicting risk for Alcohol Use Disorder using longitudinal data with multimodal biomarkers and family history: a machine learning study.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Alcohol on EEG Activity: A Systematic Review Focused on Sex-Related Differences in Youth.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- The Use of Machine Learning to Predict Offline Adolescent e-Cigarette Use: a Proof-of-Concept.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Classification of Adolescent Drinking via Behavioral, Biological and Environmental Variables: A Machine Learning Approach With Bias Control.Addiction biology · 2026Article
- Leveraging pretrained vision transformers for classifying alcohol use disorder using raw resting-state EEG.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Classification of Alcohol Use Disorder With Explainable AI.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
- A theory-informed examination of biopsychosocial influences on transdermal alcohol concentration and next-day reports of alcohol-induced blackouts in young adults.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Classification of Adolescent Drinking via Behavioral, Biological, and Environmental Features: A Machine Learning Approach with Bias Control.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Alcohol use disorder is associated with altered frontomedial phase-amplitude coupling strength during resting state.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging Pretrained Vision Transformers for classifying Alcohol Use Disorder using Raw Resting-State EEG.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The patterns of relapse and abstinence: using machine learning to identify a multidimensional signature of long-term outcome after inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning to Advance Alcohol Research: Current Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2026Review
- Identifying Predictors of Problematic Substance Use Among Youth Living with HIV in Uganda: A Machine Learning Approach.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- The effects of polygenic risks for alcohol misuse on negative emotion processing in young adult binge drinkers.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- White matter neural substrates in alcohol dependence with genetic risk and their role in pathological reward process.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Alzheimer's subtypes A supervised, unsupervised, multimodal, multilayered embedded recursive (SUMMER) AI study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pre-existing DNA methylation signatures in the prefrontal cortex of alcohol-naïve nonhuman primates define neural vulnerability for future risky ethanol consumption.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- Chronic Ethanol Exposure Produces Persistent Impairment in Cognitive Flexibility and Decision Signals in the Striatum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Next-generation biomarkers for alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorder diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment: A critical review.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Review
- The Role of Weighting Adjustment for Attrition in Longitudinal Trajectory Modeling: A Simulation Study.Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation · 2025Article
- Analyzing EEG data during opium addiction treatment using a fuzzy logic-based machine learning model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive models have succeeded in distinguishing between individuals with Alcohol use Disorder (AUD) and controls. However, predictive models identifying who is prone to develop AUD and the biomarkers indicating a predisposition to AUD are still unclear. Our sample (n = 656) included offspring and non-offspring of European American (EA) and African American (AA) ancestry from the Collaborative Study of the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) who were recruited as early as age 12 and were unaffected at first assessment and reassessed years later as AUD (DSM-5) (n = 328) or unaffected (n = 328). Machine learning analysis was performed for 220 EEG measures, 149 alcohol-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a recent large Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of alcohol use/misuse and two family history (mother DSM-5 AUD and father DSM-5 AUD) features using supervised, Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to test which features assessed before developing AUD predict those who go on to develop AUD. Age, gender, and ancestry stratified analyses were performed. Results indicate significant and higher accuracy rates for the AA compared with the EA prediction models and a higher model accuracy trend among females compared with males for both ancestries. Combined EEG and SNP features model outperformed models based on only EEG features or only SNP features for both EA and AA samples. This multidimensional superiority was confirmed in a follow-up analysis in the AA age groups (12-15, 16-19, 20-30) and EA age group (16-19). In both ancestry samples, the youngest age group achieved higher accuracy score than the two other older age groups. Maternal AUD increased the model's accuracy in both ancestries' samples. Several discriminative EEG measures and SNPs features were identified, including lower posterior gamma, higher slow wave connectivity (delta, theta, alpha), higher frontal gamma ratio, higher beta correlation in the parietal area, and 5 SNPs: rs4780836, rs2605140, rs11690265, rs692854, and rs13380649. Results highlight the significance of sampling uniformity followed by stratified (e.g., ancestry, gender, developmental period) analysis, and wider selection of features, to generate better prediction scores allowing a more accurate estimation of AUD development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.