Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594981›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Sites of persistence of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus: a paradigm shift in understanding the epidemiology of footrot in sheep.

Rachel Clifton, Katharina Giebel, Nicola L B H Liu, Kevin J Purdy, Laura E Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal assessment of the prevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outer-Membrane Vesicles ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. NF-κB signaling pathway mechanism in cow intertoe skin inflammation caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel CliftonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. R.Clifton@bham.ac.uk.
Katharina GiebelSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Kat.Giebel@qmms.co.uk.
Nicola L B H LiuSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Kevin J PurdySchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Laura E GreenSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01870X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012980/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sites of persistence of bacterial pathogens contribute to disease dynamics of bacterial diseases. Footrot is a globally important bacterial disease that reduces health and productivity of sheep. It is caused by Dichelobacter nodosus, a pathogen apparently highly specialised for feet, while Fusobacterium necrophorum, a secondary pathogen in footrot is reportedly ubiquitous on pasture. Two prospective longitudinal studies were conducted to investigate the persistence of D. nodosus and F. necrophorum in sheep feet, mouths and faeces, and in soil. Molecular tools were used to detect species, strains and communities. In contrast to the existing paradigm, F. necrophorum persisted on footrot diseased feet, and in mouths and faeces; different strains were detected in feet and mouths. D. nodosus persisted in soil and on diseased, but not healthy, feet; similar strains were detected on both healthy and diseased feet of diseased sheep. We conclude that D. nodosus and F. necrophorum depend on sheep for persistence but use different strategies to persist and spread between sheep within and between flocks. Elimination of F. necrophorum would be challenging due to faecal shedding. In contrast D. nodosus could be eliminated if all footrot-affected sheep were removed and fade out of D. nodosus occurred in the environment before re-infection of a foot.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial InfectionsDichelobacter nodosusFoot RotFusobacterium InfectionsFusobacterium necrophorumHoof and ClawSheepSheep DiseasesVirulence

Identifiers

PMID31594981
PMCPMC6783547
OpenAlexW2980257496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.