Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594967›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Negativity-bias in forming beliefs about own abilities.

Laura Müller-Pinzler, Nora Czekalla, Annalina V Mayer, David S Stolz, Valeria Gazzola, Christian Keysers, Frieder M Paulus, Sören Krach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rewards bias self-evaluations of ability.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring Asymmetries in Self-Concept Change After Discrepant Feedback.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Negativity drives online news consumption.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Müller-PinzlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany. mueller-pinzler@snl.uni-luebeck.de.
Nora CzekallaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Annalina V MayerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
David S StolzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Valeria GazzolaSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAW, Meibergdreef 47, NL-1105BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian KeysersSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAW, Meibergdreef 47, NL-1105BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2845-5467
Frieder M PaulusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Sören KrachDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Social Neuroscience Lab, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Social Neuroscience Lab · DENetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During everyday interactions people constantly receive feedback on their behavior, which shapes their beliefs about themselves. While classic studies in the field of social learning suggest that people have a tendency to learn better from good news (positivity bias) when they perceive little opportunities to immediately improve their own performance, we show updating is biased towards negative information when participants perceive the opportunity to adapt their performance during learning. In three consecutive experiments we applied a computational modeling approach on the subjects' learning behavior and reveal the negativity bias was specific for learning about own compared to others' performances and was modulated by prior beliefs about the self, i.e. stronger negativity bias in individuals lower in self-esteem. Social anxiety affected self-related negativity biases only when individuals were exposed to a judging audience thereby potentially explaining the persistence of negative self-images in socially anxious individuals which commonly surfaces in social settings. Self-related belief formation is therefore surprisingly negatively biased in situations suggesting opportunities to improve and this bias is shaped by trait differences in self-esteem and social anxiety.

Indexed as

Self ConceptSocial BehaviorAdultAnxietyAttentionBiasFearFemaleHumansLearningMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31594967
PMCPMC6783436
OpenAlexW2979463710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.