Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594900›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike, Obumneme Benaiah Ezeanosike, Chigozie Jesse Uneke

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
74.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 403 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Socioeconomic and Geographical Analysis on Antenatal Care Visits in Indonesia: A Cross-sectional Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026
    Article
  13. A retrospective review of screening for HIV, syphilis and anaemia on first antenatal care visits at a midwife-run obstetric unit in South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-AlexAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria ijeomaninadr@gmail.com.
Ifeyinwa Chizoba AkamikeAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria.
Obumneme Benaiah EzeanosikeDepartment of Paediatrics, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria.
Chigozie Jesse UnekeAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria.
Ebonyi State University · NGFederal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the determinants of antenatal care (ANC) utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched were PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary studies reporting on determinants of ANC utilisation following multivariate analysis, conducted in sub-Saharan Africa and published in English language between 2008 and 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A data extraction form was used to extract the following information: name of first author, year of publication, study location, study design, study subjects, sample size and determinants. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist for reporting a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol was used to guide the screening and eligibility of the studies. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the quality of the studies while the Andersen framework was used to report findings.

results74 studies that met the inclusion criteria were fully assessed. Most studies identified socioeconomic status, urban residence, older/increasing age, low parity, being educated and having an educated partner, being employed, being married and Christian religion as predictors of ANC attendance and timeliness. Awareness of danger signs, timing and adequate number of antenatal visits, exposure to mass media and good attitude towards ANC utilisation made attendance and initiation of ANC in first trimester more likely. Having an unplanned pregnancy, previous pregnancy complications, poor autonomy, lack of husband's support, increased distance to health facility, not having health insurance and high cost of services negatively impacted the overall uptake, timing and frequency of antenatal visits.

conclusionA variety of predisposing, enabling and need factors affect ANC utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa. Intersectoral collaboration to promote female education and empowerment, improve geographical access and strengthened implementation of ANC policies with active community participation are recommended.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic Factorsantenatal caredeterminantsprenatal caresub-Saharan Africautilisation

Identifiers

PMID31594900
PMCPMC6797296
OpenAlexW2979808892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.