Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594893›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Online survey to assess parents' experience and preferences for follow-up visits for children living with type 1 diabetes in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol.

Maude Laberge, Malek Badreddine, Monia Rekik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maude LabergeOperations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada maude.laberge@fsa.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-136X
Malek BadreddineOperations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Monia RekikOperations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is accepted that although patients may initiate a visit to a healthcare provider, follow-up visits are often based on recommendations from providers. This suggests that follow-up care, since not initiated by patients, may not reflect patients' perception of a need for care. However, few studies have examined the burden of regular follow-up care and patients' perceived value of such care. For parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), follow-up visits are scheduled regardless of how well controlled the diabetes is. Our study examines how benefits and burden from the parents' perspective could affect their preferences in regard to the frequency of regular follow-up care.

methodsWe aim to develop an online patient survey to be distributed to parents of children living with T1D in the province of Quebec, Canada. The survey will be available in French and English, and distributed through diabetes clinics, on social media groups and forums for parents of children with T1D. The survey will be developed in collaboration with parents of children with T1D to ensure that it appropriately reflects the services in regular follow-up care and that the language is understandable and clear. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will be informed of the requirements and objectives of the survey at the beginning of the questionnaire and that the data collected will remain anonymous and confidential. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the research ethics committee of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Results of the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders with the aim of improving practices and better meeting patients' and families' needs.

Indexed as

AftercareCost of IllnessDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Patient Acceptance of Health CareAmbulatory CareCanadaChildConsumer BehaviorCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleParentsQualitative ResearchResearch Designdisease burdenpaediatric diabetespatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID31594893
PMCPMC6797364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.