Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594892›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.

Salma Shickh, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Mariana Gutierrez Salazar, Kathleen-Rose Zakoor, Rita Kodida, Emma Reble, Christine Elser, Andrea Eisen, Seema Panchal and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03597165 (The Health Outcomes, Utility, and Costs of Returning Incidental Genomic Findings), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03597165 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Health Outcomes, Utility, and Costs of Returning Incidental Genomic Findings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2018 to 2027Enrolled289ConditionsCancerArmsIncidental Genomic Sequencing Results, GS Results for Primary Indications only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Opportunistic genomic screening has clinical utility: An interventional cohort study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Salma ShickhInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marc ClausenGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chloe MightonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mariana Gutierrez SalazarGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kathleen-Rose ZakoorLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rita KodidaGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emma RebleGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine ElserFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea EisenOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Seema PanchalMarvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Melyssa AronsonZane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tracy GrahamOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan Randall ArmelFamilial Breast Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chantal F MorelFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ramzi FattouhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily GlogowskiGeneDx, Elmwood Park, New Jersey, USA.
Kasmintan A SchraderDepartment of Molecular Oncology and Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jada G HamiltonClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Kenneth OffitClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Mark RobsonClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
June C CarrollRay D Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raymond H KimFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan Lerner-EllisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin E ThorpeApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andreas LaupacisFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yvonne BombardInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada yvonne.bombard@utoronto.ca.
Incidental Genomics Study Team

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
CIHRNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGenomic sequencing has rapidly transitioned into clinical practice, improving diagnosis and treatment options for patients with hereditary disorders. However, large-scale implementation of genomic sequencing faces challenges, especially with regard to the return of incidental results, which refer to genetic variants uncovered during testing that are unrelated to the primary disease under investigation, but of potential clinical significance. High-quality evidence evaluating health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results is critical for the adoption of genomic sequencing into clinical care and to understand the unintended consequences of adoption of genomic sequencing. We aim to evaluate the health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results for patients undergoing genomic sequencing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will compare health outcomes and costs of receiving, versus not receiving, incidental results for adult patients with cancer undergoing genomic sequencing in a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. Two hundred and sixty patients who have previously undergone first or second-tier genetic testing for cancer and received uninformative results will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto, Ontario. Participants in both arms will receive cancer-related results. Participants in the intervention arm have the option to receive incidental results. Our primary outcome is psychological distress at 2 weeks following return of results. Secondary outcomes include behavioural consequences, clinical and personal utility assessed over the 12 months after results are returned and health service use and costs at 12 months and 5 years. A subset of participants and providers will complete qualitative interviews about utility of incidental results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System that provides ethical review and oversight for multiple sites participating in the same clinical trial in Ontario.Results from the trial will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences, and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03597165.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sequence Analysis, DNAAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleGenetic TestingGenetic VariationHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical utilitygenomic sequencinghealth care services use and costsincidental findingsrandomized controlled trialsecondary findings

Identifiers

PMID31594892
PMCPMC6797333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.