Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594875›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

A bit or a lot on the side? Observational study of the energy content of starters, sides and desserts in major UK restaurant chains.

Magdalena Muc, Andrew Jones, Carl Roberts, Florence Sheen, Ashleigh Haynes, Eric Robinson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena MucDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK mmuc@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6323-9973
Andrew JonesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Carl RobertsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Florence SheenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ashleigh HaynesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Eric RobinsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N000218/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur objective was to examine the kilocalorie (kcal) content of starters, sides and desserts served in major UK restaurant chains, comparing the kcal content of these dishes in fast-food and full-service restaurants.

designObservational study.

settingMenu and nutritional information provided online by major UK restaurant chains.

methodDuring October to November 2018, we accessed websites of restaurant chains with 50 or more outlets in the UK. Menu items that constituted starters, sides or desserts were identified and their kcal content was extracted. Accompanying beverages were not included. We used multilevel modelling to examine whether mean kcal content of dishes differed in fast-food versus full-service restaurants.

main outcome measuresThe mean kcal content of dishes and the proportion of dishes exceeding public health recommendations for energy content in a main meal (>600 kcal).

resultsA total of 1009 dishes (212 starters, 318 sides and 479 desserts) from 27 restaurant chains (21 full-service, 6 fast-food) were included. The mean kcal content of eligible dishes was 488.0 (SE=15.6) for starters, 397.5 (SE=14.9) for sides and 430.6 (SE=11.5) for desserts. The percentage of dishes exceeding 600 kcal was 26.4% for starters, 21.7% for sides and 20.5% for desserts. Compared with fast-food chains, desserts offered at full-service restaurants were on average more calorific and were significantly more likely to exceed 600 kcal.

conclusionsThe average energy content of sides, starters and desserts sold in major UK restaurants is high. One in four starters and one in five sides and desserts in UK chain restaurants exceed the recommended energy intake for an entire meal.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsNutritive ValueRestaurantsFood LabelingHumansMealsUnited Kingdomeating outfood environmentkilocaloriesobesityrestaurant food

Identifiers

PMID31594875
PMCPMC6797243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.