Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31594739›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of emergency medicine2019

A Comparison of the Efficacy of Enema Solutions in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.

Julie Anderson, Ronald A Furnival, Lei Zhang, Scott A Lunos, Zujaja Sadiq, Jonathan R Strutt, Rahul Kaila, Marissa A Hendrickson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie AndersonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ronald A FurnivalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lei ZhangClinical and Translational Science Institute/Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Scott A LunosClinical and Translational Science Institute/Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Zujaja SadiqDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jonathan R StruttDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rahul KailaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Marissa A HendricksonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren presenting to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) are frequently given enemas for relief of constipation symptoms; there is very little literature guiding solution selection.

objectiveOur aim was to assess and compare the efficacy of the various enema solutions used in a pediatric ED, including the "pink lady," a previously unreported compounded combination of docusate, magnesium citrate, mineral oil, and sodium phosphate.

methodsWe identified all children who received any enema over a 5-year period in an urban, quaternary care pediatric ED for inclusion in the study via electronic record review. Physician investigators retrospectively reviewed routine visit documentation to confirm the type and dosage of enema and assess comorbidities, indications, efficacy, and side effects. Subjective descriptions of output were classified as none, small, medium, or large by reviewer consensus.

resultsThere were 768 records included. Median age was 6.2 years (interquartile range 3.3-10.3 years). Solutions used were sodium phosphate (n = 396), pink lady (n = 198), soap suds (n = 160), and other (n = 14). There was no significant difference in output by solution type (p = 0.88). Volume delivered was highest for pink lady, with no significant association between volume delivered and output (p = 0.48). Four percent of patients had side effects. Soap suds had a significantly higher rate of side effects (10.6%; p = 0.0003), primarily abdominal pain.

conclusionsThere was no significant difference in reported stool output produced by sodium phosphate, soap suds, and pink lady enemas in children treated in an ED. Further study via randomized controlled trials would be beneficial in guiding selection of enema solution.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAnalysis of VarianceChildChild, PreschoolConstipationEmergency Service, HospitalEnemaFemaleHumansMalePediatricsRetrospective StudiesSolutionsSolutionsconstipationefficacyenemapink lady

Identifiers

PMID31594739
PMCPMC6864264
OpenAlexW2978620346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.