Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31593377›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Estimation of effective imaging dose and excess absolute risk of secondary cancer incidence for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography acquisition.

Yuki Yuasa, Takehiro Shiinoki, Ryota Onizuka, Koya Fujimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Low dose radiation therapy for COVID-19: Effective dose and estimation of cancer risk.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki YuasaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Takehiro ShiinokiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Ryota OnizukaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Koya FujimotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI 18K07753Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI 19K17170Shin-Nihon Foundation of Advanced Medical ResearchTakeda Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to estimate the organ equivalent dose and effective imaging dose for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) using a Monte Carlo simulation, and to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer incidence. The EGSnrc/BEAMnrc were used to simulate the on-board imager (OBI) from the TrueBeam linear accelerator. Specifically, the OBI was modeled based on the percent depth dose and the off-center ratio was measured using a three-dimensional (3D) water phantom. For clinical cases, 15 lung and liver cancer patients were simulated using the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The mean absorbed doses to the lung, stomach, bone marrow, esophagus, liver, thyroid, bone surface, skin, adrenal glands, gallbladder, heart, intestine, kidney, pancreas and spleen, were quantified using a treatment planning system, and the equivalent doses to each organ were calculated. Subsequently, the effective dose was calculated as the weighted sum of the equivalent dose, and the EAR of the secondary cancer incidence was determined for each organ with the use of the biologic effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR) VII model. The effective doses were 3.9 ± 0.5, 15.7 ± 2.0, and 7.3 ± 0.9 mSv, for the lung, and 4.2 ± 0.6, 16.7 ± 2.4, and 7.8 ± 1.1 mSv, for the liver in the respective cases of the 3D-CBCT (thorax, pelvis) and 4D-CBCT modes. The lung EARs for males and females were 7.3 and 10.7 cases per million person-years, whereas the liver EARs were 9.9 and 4.5 cases per million person-years. The EAR increased with increasing time since radiation exposure. In clinical studies, we should use 4D-CBCT based on consideration of the effective dose and EAR of secondary cancer incidence.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingAdultAgedAlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIncidenceJapanLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo Methodeffective dosefour-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographyMonte Carlo simulationsecondary cancer risk

Identifiers

PMID31593377
PMCPMC6839364
OpenAlexW2979898251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.