ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019
Estimation of effective imaging dose and excess absolute risk of secondary cancer incidence for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography acquisition.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- From standard to stratified: Modeling NTCP and EAR to personalize daily MV-CBCT in radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Accounting for TLD response to CBCT protocols in external beam radiotherapy dose monitoring.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Real-time spatiotemporal optimization during imaging.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Deep learning based super-resolution for CBCT dose reduction in radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Intra- and inter-fractional variations of tumors with fiducial markers measured using respiratory-correlated computed tomography images for respiratory gated lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Faster and lower dose imaging: evaluating adaptive, constant gantry velocity and angular separation in fast low-dose 4D cone beam CT imaging.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a new acrylic-lead shielding device for peripheral dose reduction during cone-beam computed tomography.BJR open · 2022Article
- Article
- Low dose radiation therapy for COVID-19: Effective dose and estimation of cancer risk.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020Article
- Diagnostic Reference Level of Radiation Dose and Image Quality among Paediatric CT Examinations in A Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Dosimetric and Radiobiological Impact of Patient Setup Errors in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Evaluation of Concomitant Imaging Dose in 4D-CBCT Guided Thoracic Radiotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study was conducted to estimate the organ equivalent dose and effective imaging dose for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) using a Monte Carlo simulation, and to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer incidence. The EGSnrc/BEAMnrc were used to simulate the on-board imager (OBI) from the TrueBeam linear accelerator. Specifically, the OBI was modeled based on the percent depth dose and the off-center ratio was measured using a three-dimensional (3D) water phantom. For clinical cases, 15 lung and liver cancer patients were simulated using the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The mean absorbed doses to the lung, stomach, bone marrow, esophagus, liver, thyroid, bone surface, skin, adrenal glands, gallbladder, heart, intestine, kidney, pancreas and spleen, were quantified using a treatment planning system, and the equivalent doses to each organ were calculated. Subsequently, the effective dose was calculated as the weighted sum of the equivalent dose, and the EAR of the secondary cancer incidence was determined for each organ with the use of the biologic effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR) VII model. The effective doses were 3.9 ± 0.5, 15.7 ± 2.0, and 7.3 ± 0.9 mSv, for the lung, and 4.2 ± 0.6, 16.7 ± 2.4, and 7.8 ± 1.1 mSv, for the liver in the respective cases of the 3D-CBCT (thorax, pelvis) and 4D-CBCT modes. The lung EARs for males and females were 7.3 and 10.7 cases per million person-years, whereas the liver EARs were 9.9 and 4.5 cases per million person-years. The EAR increased with increasing time since radiation exposure. In clinical studies, we should use 4D-CBCT based on consideration of the effective dose and EAR of secondary cancer incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.