Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31593247›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019

Comparing two neurocognitive models of self-control during dietary decisions.

Danielle Cosme, Rita M Ludwig, Elliot T Berkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The temporal dynamics of self-control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Body mass index-dependent shifts along large-scale gradients in human cortical organization explain dietary regulatory success.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danielle CosmeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA.
Rita M LudwigDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA.
Elliot T BerkmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA.

Funding

Supplement to Prevention Research Center: Parenting Among Women Who Are Opioid Users, Project 2P50DA048756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MACKIEWICZ SEGHETE, KRISTEN L · 2019 to 2023
$18.0M
Cancer Prevention through Dietary Change: Training in translational neuroimagingF31CA232357 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI COSME, DANIELLE · 2019 to 2019
$40k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA232357NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-control is the process of favoring abstract, distal goals over concrete, proximal goals during decision-making and is an important factor in health and well-being. We directly compare two prominent neurocognitive models of human self-control with the goal of identifying which, if either, best describes behavioral and neural data of dietary decisions in a large sample of overweight and obese adults motivated to eat more healthfully. We extracted trial-by-trial estimates of neural activity during incentive-compatible choice from three brain regions implicated in self-control, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and assessed evidence for the dual-process and value-based choice models of self-control using multilevel modeling. Model comparison tests revealed that the value-based choice model outperformed the dual-process model and best fit the observed data. These results advance scientific knowledge of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self-control-relevant decision-making and are consistent with a value-based choice model of self-control.

Indexed as

DietAdultBrainBrain MappingChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObesityPrefrontal CortexSelf-ControlVentral Striatumdecision neurosciencedual-processhealthself-controlvalue-based choice

Identifiers

PMID31593247
PMCPMC6917023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.