Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31593123›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Which is the best probiotic treatment strategy to prevent the necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants: A network meta-analysis revealing the efficacy and safety.

Le-Wee Bi, Bei-Lei Yan, Qian-Yu Yang, Miao-Miao Li, Hua-Lei Cui

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05945017 (Probiotics and the Neurodevelopment in the Premature Infant <32 Weeks Gestational Age and <1500g), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05945017 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Probiotics and the Neurodevelopment in the Premature Infant <32 Weeks Gestational Age and <1500g

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion Clinic per a la Recerca BiomédicaRan2014 to 2027Enrolled233ConditionsInfant, Newborn, Diseases, Infant DevelopmentArmsInfloran® -Berne, Switzerland- (Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDO 1748
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current Status of Probiotics for Preterm Infants.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Le-Wee BiDepartment of the Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University.
Bei-Lei YanDepartment of the Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University.
Qian-Yu YangDepartment of the Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University.
Miao-Miao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hua-Lei CuiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have neglected to report the specific action of different probiotic genera in preterm infants. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of specific probiotic genera, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify the best prevention strategy for necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.

methodsMEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials had been searched for randomized control trials reporting the probiotics strategy for premature infants.

resultsWe identified 34 eligible studies of 9161 participants. The intervention in the observation group was to add probiotics for feeding: Lactobacilli in 6 studies; Bifidobacterium in 8 studies; Bacillus in 1 study; Saccharomyces in 4 studies and probiotic mixture in 15 studies. This NMA showed a significant advantage of probiotic mixture and Bifidobacterium to prevent the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. A probiotic mixture showed effectiveness in reducing mortality in preterm infants.

conclusionThe recent literature has reported a total of 5 probiotic strategies, including Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and probiotic mixture. Our thorough review and NMA provided a piece of available evidence to choose optimal probiotics prophylactic strategy for premature infants. The results indicated that probiotic mixture and Bifidobacterium showed a stronger advantage to use in preterm infants; the other probiotic genera failed to show an obvious effect to reduce the incidence of NEC, sepsis and all-cause death. More trials need to be performed to determine the optimal probiotic treatment strategy to prevent preterm related complications.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, PrematureLactobacillusPlacebosPrenatal CareProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisTreatment OutcomePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID31593123
PMCPMC6799420
OpenAlexW2980118337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.