SynthesisMedicine2019
Psychological effects of advanced care on patients received endoscopic gastric cancer resection.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Influence of standardized evidence-based nursing practices on mental state and adverse effects in patients undergoing endoscopic colon polypectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery based on multidisciplinary collaboration model in postoperative gastric cancer surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Investigation of negative emotions and sleep quality in gastric cancer patients and intervention strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Impact of web-based positive psychological intervention on emotions, psychological capital, and quality of life in gastric cancer patients on chemotherapy.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- The influence of family support during endoscopic submucosal dissection on patient's anxiety.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effects of high-quality nursing intervention on negative emotions, postoperative complications and gastrointestinal function in patients with gastric cancer surgery.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Application of Refined Nursing Combined with Comprehensive Treatment of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in Gastrointestinal Dysfunction after Tumor Operation.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Study Protocol Titles: Erratum.Medicine · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study will systematically evaluate the psychological effects of advanced care (AC) on patients who received endoscopic gastric cancer resection (EGCR).
methodsThis study will search the following databases of Cochrane Library, Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, WANGFANG, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to the present with no language limitation. All randomized controlled trials on assessing the psychological effects of AC for patients with EGCR will be included.
resultsThis study will explore the psychological effects of AC on EGCR by assessing depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.
conclusionThis study will summarize recent evidence for the psychological effects of AC on EGCR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019139868.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.