Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31592487›Full record

ArticleACS omega2019

In-Solution Molecular Recognition Comparison of Aptamers against the Herbicide Atrazine.

Mina Roueinfar, Kevin M Abraham, Ka Lok Hong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mina RoueinfarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Department of Biology, College of Science and Engineering, and Department of Physics, College of Science and Engineering, Wilkes University, 84 W. South Street, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18766, United States.
Kevin M AbrahamDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Department of Biology, College of Science and Engineering, and Department of Physics, College of Science and Engineering, Wilkes University, 84 W. South Street, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18766, United States.
Ka Lok HongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Department of Biology, College of Science and Engineering, and Department of Physics, College of Science and Engineering, Wilkes University, 84 W. South Street, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18766, United States.
Wilkes University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrazine is a common herbicide that is widely used to control weed growth in both agricultural and residential settings. It has been shown to act as an endocrine disruptor that affects aquatic organisms. Rapid and low-cost monitoring methods for atrazine is the first step to mitigate its widespread persistency. Aptamers are small synthetic oligonucleotides that can assume a 3D structure to act as the molecular recognition element for a specific target of interest. Two different atrazine binding aptamers (R12.23 Trunc. and R12.45 Trunc.) have been identified from the same library design but with fundamentally different in vitro selection methodologies. While the R12.23 Trunc. has been utilized in immobilized biosensing platforms, it is unclear if in-solution-based applications would be suitable for both atrazine binding aptamers. This study provides the first insight of comparative in-solution binding profiles of the two atrazine binding aptamers. Based on our results, this information will be useful for future biosensing platform development utilizing the two aptamers.

Identifiers

PMID31592487
PMCPMC6777074
OpenAlexW2974264132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.